Total
1042 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2020-12143 | 2 Arubanetworks, Silver-peak | 44 Nx-1000, Nx-10k, Nx-11k and 41 more | 2023-11-07 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 4.9 MEDIUM |
| The certificate used to identify Orchestrator to EdgeConnect devices is not validated, which makes it possible for someone to establish a TLS connection from EdgeConnect to an untrusted Orchestrator. | |||||
| CVE-2020-12144 | 2 Arubanetworks, Silver-peak | 44 Nx-1000, Nx-10k, Nx-11k and 41 more | 2023-11-07 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 4.9 MEDIUM |
| The certificate used to identify the Silver Peak Cloud Portal to EdgeConnect devices is not validated. This makes it possible for someone to establish a TLS connection from EdgeConnect to an untrusted portal. | |||||
| CVE-2023-30729 | 1 Samsung | 1 Email | 2023-11-07 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| Improper Certificate Validation in Samsung Email prior to version 6.1.82.0 allows remote attacker to intercept the network traffic including sensitive information. | |||||
| CVE-2023-2422 | 1 Redhat | 4 Enterprise Linux, Keycloak, Openshift Container Platform and 1 more | 2023-11-07 | N/A | 7.1 HIGH |
| A flaw was found in Keycloak. A Keycloak server configured to support mTLS authentication for OAuth/OpenID clients does not properly verify the client certificate chain. A client that possesses a proper certificate can authorize itself as any other client, therefore, access data that belongs to other clients. | |||||
| CVE-2023-29175 | 1 Fortinet | 2 Fortios, Fortiproxy | 2023-11-07 | N/A | 4.8 MEDIUM |
| An improper certificate validation vulnerability [CWE-295] in FortiOS 6.2 all versions, 6.4 all versions, 7.0.0 through 7.0.10, 7.2.0 and FortiProxy 1.2 all versions, 2.0 all versions, 7.0.0 through 7.0.9, 7.2.0 through 7.2.3 may allow a remote and unauthenticated attacker to perform a Man-in-the-Middle attack on the communication channel between the vulnerable device and the remote FortiGuard's map server. | |||||
| CVE-2023-23690 | 1 Dell | 1 Cloud Mobility For Dell Emc Storage | 2023-11-07 | N/A | 7.0 HIGH |
| Cloud Mobility for Dell EMC Storage, versions 1.3.0.X and below contains an Improper Check for Certificate Revocation vulnerability. A threat actor does not need any specific privileges to potentially exploit this vulnerability. An attacker could perform a man-in-the-middle attack and eavesdrop on encrypted communications from Cloud Mobility to Cloud Storage devices. Exploitation could lead to the compromise of secret and sensitive information, cloud storage connection downtime, and the integrity of the connection to the Cloud devices. | |||||
| CVE-2023-22642 | 1 Fortinet | 2 Fortianalyzer, Fortimanager | 2023-11-07 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH |
| An improper certificate validation vulnerability [CWE-295] in FortiAnalyzer and FortiManager 7.2.0 through 7.2.1, 7.0.0 through 7.0.5, 6.4.8 through 6.4.10 may allow a remote and unauthenticated attacker to perform a Man-in-the-Middle attack on the communication channel between the device and the remote FortiGuard server hosting outbreakalert ressources. | |||||
| CVE-2023-1055 | 2 Fedoraproject, Redhat | 2 Fedora, Directory Server | 2023-11-07 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| A flaw was found in RHDS 11 and RHDS 12. While browsing entries LDAP tries to decode the userPassword attribute instead of the userCertificate attribute which could lead into sensitive information leaked. An attacker with a local account where the cockpit-389-ds is running can list the processes and display the hashed passwords. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality. | |||||
| CVE-2022-4895 | 2 Hitachi, Linux | 3 Infrastructure Analytics Advisor, Ops Center Analyzer, Linux Kernel | 2023-11-07 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH |
| Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in Hitachi Infrastructure Analytics Advisor on Linux (Analytics probe component), Hitachi Ops Center Analyzer on Linux (Analyzer probe component) allows Man in the Middle Attack.This issue affects Hitachi Infrastructure Analytics Advisor: from 2.0.0-00 through 4.4.0-00; Hitachi Ops Center Analyzer: from 10.0.0-00 before 10.9.1-00. | |||||
| CVE-2022-45100 | 1 Dell | 1 Emc Powerscale Onefs | 2023-11-07 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Dell PowerScale OneFS, versions 8.2.x-9.3.x, contains an Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability. An remote unauthenticated attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to a full compromise of the system. | |||||
| CVE-2022-3913 | 1 Rapid7 | 1 Nexpose | 2023-11-07 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| Rapid7 Nexpose and InsightVM versions 6.6.82 through 6.6.177 fail to validate the certificate of the update server when downloading updates. This failure could allow an attacker in a privileged position on the network to provide their own HTTPS endpoint, or intercept communications to the legitimate endpoint. The attacker would need some pre-existing access to at least one node on the network path between the Rapid7-controlled update server and the Nexpose/InsightVM application, and the ability to either spoof the update server's FQDN or redirect legitimate traffic to the attacker's server in order to exploit this vulnerability. Note that even in this scenario, an attacker could not normally replace an update package with a malicious package, since the update process validates a separate, code-signing certificate, distinct from the HTTPS certificate used for communication. This issue was resolved on February 1, 2023 in update 6.6.178 of Nexpose and InsightVM. | |||||
| CVE-2022-39264 | 2 Fedoraproject, Nheko-reborn | 2 Fedora, Nheko | 2023-11-07 | N/A | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| nheko is a desktop client for the Matrix communication application. All versions below 0.10.2 are vulnerable homeservers inserting malicious secrets, which could lead to man-in-the-middle attacks. Users can upgrade to version 0.10.2 to protect against this issue. As a workaround, one may apply the patch manually, avoid doing verifications of one's own devices, and/or avoid pressing the request button in the settings menu. | |||||
| CVE-2022-39948 | 1 Fortinet | 2 Fortios, Fortiproxy | 2023-11-07 | N/A | 7.4 HIGH |
| An improper certificate validation vulnerability [CWE-295] in FortiOS 7.2.0 through 7.2.3, 7.0.0 through 7.0.7, 6.4 all versions, 6.2 all versions, 6.0 all versions and FortiProxy 7.0.0 through 7.0.6, 2.0 all versions, 1.2 all versions may allow a remote and unauthenticated attacker to perform a Man-in-the-Middle attack on the communication channel between the FortiOS/FortiProxy device and remote servers hosting threat feeds (when the latter are configured as Fabric connectors in FortiOS/FortiProxy) | |||||
| CVE-2022-34404 | 1 Dell | 1 System Update | 2023-11-07 | N/A | 6.0 MEDIUM |
| Dell System Update, version 2.0.0 and earlier, contains an Improper Certificate Validation in data parser module. A local attacker with high privileges could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to credential theft and/or denial of service. | |||||
| CVE-2022-34156 | 1 Hjholdings | 1 Hulu | 2023-11-07 | N/A | 4.8 MEDIUM |
| 'Hulu / ????' App for iOS versions prior to 3.0.81 improperly verifies server certificates, which may allow an attacker to eavesdrop on an encrypted communication via a man-in-the-middle attack. | |||||
| CVE-2022-32156 | 1 Splunk | 2 Splunk, Universal Forwarder | 2023-11-07 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| In Splunk Enterprise and Universal Forwarder versions before 9.0, the Splunk command-line interface (CLI) did not validate TLS certificates while connecting to a remote Splunk platform instance by default. After updating to version 9.0, see Configure TLS host name validation for the Splunk CLI https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/9.0.0/Security/EnableTLSCertHostnameValidation#Configure_TLS_host_name_validation_for_the_Splunk_CLI to enable the remediation. The vulnerability does not affect the Splunk Cloud Platform. At the time of publishing, we have no evidence of exploitation of this vulnerability by external parties. The issue requires conditions beyond the control of a potential bad actor such as a machine-in-the-middle attack. Hence, Splunk rates the complexity of the attack as High. | |||||
| CVE-2022-20813 | 1 Cisco | 2 Expressway, Telepresence Video Communication Server | 2023-11-07 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| Multiple vulnerabilities in the API and in the web-based management interface of Cisco Expressway Series and Cisco TelePresence Video Communication Server (VCS) could allow a remote attacker to overwrite arbitrary files or conduct null byte poisoning attacks on an affected device. Note: Cisco Expressway Series refers to the Expressway Control (Expressway-C) device and the Expressway Edge (Expressway-E) device. For more information about these vulnerabilities, see the Details section of this advisory. | |||||
| CVE-2022-20860 | 1 Cisco | 1 Nexus Dashboard | 2023-11-07 | N/A | 7.4 HIGH |
| A vulnerability in the SSL/TLS implementation of Cisco Nexus Dashboard could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to alter communications with associated controllers or view sensitive information. This vulnerability exists because SSL server certificates are not validated when Cisco Nexus Dashboard is establishing a connection to Cisco Application Policy Infrastructure Controller (APIC), Cisco Cloud APIC, or Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller, formerly Data Center Network Manager (DCNM) controllers. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by using man-in-the-middle techniques to intercept the traffic between the affected device and the controllers, and then using a crafted certificate to impersonate the controllers. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to alter communications between devices or view sensitive information, including Administrator credentials for these controllers. | |||||
| CVE-2022-22305 | 1 Fortinet | 4 Fortianalyzer, Fortimanager, Fortios and 1 more | 2023-11-07 | N/A | 4.2 MEDIUM |
| An improper certificate validation vulnerability [CWE-295] in FortiManager 7.0.1 and below, 6.4.6 and below; FortiAnalyzer 7.0.2 and below, 6.4.7 and below; FortiOS 6.2.x and 6.0.x; FortiSandbox 4.0.x, 3.2.x and 3.1.x may allow a network adjacent and unauthenticated attacker to man-in-the-middle the communication between the listed products and some external peers. | |||||
| CVE-2021-44549 | 1 Apache | 1 Sling Commons Messaging Mail | 2023-11-07 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 7.4 HIGH |
| Apache Sling Commons Messaging Mail provides a simple layer on top of JavaMail/Jakarta Mail for OSGi to send mails via SMTPS. To reduce the risk of "man in the middle" attacks additional server identity checks must be performed when accessing mail servers. For compatibility reasons these additional checks are disabled by default in JavaMail/Jakarta Mail. The SimpleMailService in Apache Sling Commons Messaging Mail 1.0 lacks an option to enable these checks for the shared mail session. A user could enable these checks nevertheless by accessing the session via the message created by SimpleMessageBuilder and setting the property mail.smtps.ssl.checkserveridentity to true. Apache Sling Commons Messaging Mail 2.0 adds support for enabling server identity checks and these checks are enabled by default. - https://javaee.github.io/javamail/docs/SSLNOTES.txt - https://javaee.github.io/javamail/docs/api/com/sun/mail/smtp/package-summary.html - https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/mail/issues/429 | |||||