Total
1042 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2023-32330 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Verify Access | 2024-02-10 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| IBM Security Verify Access 10.0.0.0 through 10.0.6.1 uses insecure calls that could allow an attacker on the network to take control of the server. IBM X-Force ID: 254977. | |||||
| CVE-2023-28807 | 1 Zscaler | 1 Secure Internet And Saas Access | 2024-02-09 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| In Zscaler Internet Access (ZIA) a mismatch between Connect Host and Client Hello's Server Name Indication (SNI) enables attackers to evade network security controls by hiding their communications within legitimate traffic. | |||||
| CVE-2003-1229 | 2 Oracle, Sun | 3 Jre, Java Web Start, Jsse | 2024-02-09 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
| X509TrustManager in (1) Java Secure Socket Extension (JSSE) in SDK and JRE 1.4.0 through 1.4.0_01, (2) JSSE before 1.0.3, (3) Java Plug-in SDK and JRE 1.3.0 through 1.4.1, and (4) Java Web Start 1.0 through 1.2 incorrectly calls the isClientTrusted method when determining server trust, which results in improper validation of digital certificate and allows remote attackers to (1) falsely authenticate peers for SSL or (2) incorrectly validate signed JAR files. | |||||
| CVE-2002-0862 | 2 Apple, Microsoft | 10 Macos, Internet Explorer, Office and 7 more | 2024-02-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The (1) CertGetCertificateChain, (2) CertVerifyCertificateChainPolicy, and (3) WinVerifyTrust APIs within the CryptoAPI for Microsoft products including Microsoft Windows 98 through XP, Office for Mac, Internet Explorer for Mac, and Outlook Express for Mac, do not properly verify the Basic Constraints of intermediate CA-signed X.509 certificates, which allows remote attackers to spoof the certificates of trusted sites via a man-in-the-middle attack for SSL sessions, as originally reported for Internet Explorer and IIS. | |||||
| CVE-2019-12496 | 1 Hybridgroup | 1 Gobot | 2024-02-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in Hybrid Group Gobot before 1.13.0. The mqtt subsystem skips verification of root CA certificates by default. | |||||
| CVE-2008-4989 | 6 Canonical, Debian, Fedoraproject and 3 more | 7 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Fedora and 4 more | 2024-02-09 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| The _gnutls_x509_verify_certificate function in lib/x509/verify.c in libgnutls in GnuTLS before 2.6.1 trusts certificate chains in which the last certificate is an arbitrary trusted, self-signed certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to insert a spoofed certificate for any Distinguished Name (DN). | |||||
| CVE-2014-1266 | 1 Apple | 3 Iphone Os, Mac Os X, Tvos | 2024-02-09 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 7.4 HIGH |
| The SSLVerifySignedServerKeyExchange function in libsecurity_ssl/lib/sslKeyExchange.c in the Secure Transport feature in the Data Security component in Apple iOS 6.x before 6.1.6 and 7.x before 7.0.6, Apple TV 6.x before 6.0.2, and Apple OS X 10.9.x before 10.9.2 does not check the signature in a TLS Server Key Exchange message, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers by (1) using an arbitrary private key for the signing step or (2) omitting the signing step. | |||||
| CVE-2012-5821 | 2 Canonical, Lynx | 2 Ubuntu Linux, Lynx | 2024-02-09 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| Lynx does not verify that the server's certificate is signed by a trusted certification authority, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via a crafted certificate, related to improper use of a certain GnuTLS function. | |||||
| CVE-2009-3046 | 1 Opera | 1 Opera Browser | 2024-02-09 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Opera before 10.00 does not check all intermediate X.509 certificates for revocation, which makes it easier for remote SSL servers to bypass validation of the certificate chain via a revoked certificate. | |||||
| CVE-2020-29504 | 1 Dell | 2 Bsafe Crypto-c-micro-edition, Bsafe Micro-edition-suite | 2024-02-08 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Dell BSAFE Crypto-C Micro Edition, versions before 4.1.5, and Dell BSAFE Micro Edition Suite, versions before 4.5.2, contain a Missing Required Cryptographic Step Vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2018-17215 | 1 Postman | 1 Postman | 2024-02-01 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| An information-disclosure issue was discovered in Postman through 6.3.0. It validates a server's X.509 certificate and presents an error if the certificate is not valid. Unfortunately, the associated HTTPS request data is sent anyway. Only the response is not displayed. Thus, all contained information of the HTTPS request is disclosed to a man-in-the-middle attacker (for example, user credentials). | |||||
| CVE-2017-2667 | 2 Redhat, Theforeman | 3 Satellite, Satellite Capsule, Hammer Cli | 2024-01-26 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| Hammer CLI, a CLI utility for Foreman, before version 0.10.0, did not explicitly set the verify_ssl flag for apipie-bindings that disable it by default. As a result the server certificates are not checked and connections are prone to man-in-the-middle attacks. | |||||
| CVE-2023-6043 | 1 Lenovo | 1 Vantage | 2024-01-26 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| A privilege escalation vulnerability was reported in Lenovo Vantage that could allow a local attacker to bypass integrity checks and execute arbitrary code with elevated privileges. | |||||
| CVE-2022-20960 | 1 Cisco | 1 Email Security Appliance | 2024-01-25 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| A vulnerability in Cisco AsyncOS Software for Cisco Email Security Appliance (ESA) could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to improper handling of certain TLS connections that are processed by an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by establishing a large number of concurrent TLS connections to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause the device to drop new TLS email messages that come from the associated email servers. Exploitation of this vulnerability does not cause the affected device to unexpectedly reload. The device will recover autonomously within a few hours of when the attack is halted or mitigated. | |||||
| CVE-2023-23588 | 2 Microchip, Siemens | 10 Maxview Storage Manager, Simatic Ipc1047, Simatic Ipc1047 Firmware and 7 more | 2024-01-11 | N/A | 6.3 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SIMATIC IPC1047 (All versions), SIMATIC IPC1047E (All versions with maxView Storage Manager < 4.09.00.25611 on Windows), SIMATIC IPC647D (All versions), SIMATIC IPC647E (All versions with maxView Storage Manager < 4.09.00.25611 on Windows), SIMATIC IPC847D (All versions), SIMATIC IPC847E (All versions with maxView Storage Manager < 4.09.00.25611 on Windows). The Adaptec Maxview application on affected devices is using a non-unique TLS certificate across installations to protect the communication from the local browser to the local application. A local attacker may use this key to decrypt intercepted local traffic between the browser and the application and could perform a man-in-the-middle attack in order to modify data in transit. | |||||
| CVE-2023-34414 | 1 Mozilla | 3 Firefox, Firefox Esr, Thunderbird | 2024-01-07 | N/A | 3.1 LOW |
| The error page for sites with invalid TLS certificates was missing the activation-delay Firefox uses to protect prompts and permission dialogs from attacks that exploit human response time delays. If a malicious page elicited user clicks in precise locations immediately before navigating to a site with a certificate error and made the renderer extremely busy at the same time, it could create a gap between when the error page was loaded and when the display actually refreshed. With the right timing the elicited clicks could land in that gap and activate the button that overrides the certificate error for that site. This vulnerability affects Firefox ESR < 102.12, Firefox < 114, and Thunderbird < 102.12. | |||||
| CVE-2021-22939 | 5 Debian, Netapp, Nodejs and 2 more | 8 Debian Linux, Nextgen Api, Node.js and 5 more | 2024-01-05 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| If the Node.js https API was used incorrectly and "undefined" was in passed for the "rejectUnauthorized" parameter, no error was returned and connections to servers with an expired certificate would have been accepted. | |||||
| CVE-2023-5594 | 1 Eset | 9 Endpoint Antivirus, Endpoint Security, File Security and 6 more | 2024-01-04 | N/A | 8.6 HIGH |
| Improper validation of the server’s certificate chain in secure traffic scanning feature considered intermediate certificate signed using the MD5 or SHA1 algorithm as trusted. | |||||
| CVE-2023-51662 | 1 Snowflake | 1 Snowflake Connector | 2024-01-03 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| The Snowflake .NET driver provides an interface to the Microsoft .NET open source software framework for developing applications. Snowflake recently received a report about a vulnerability in the Snowflake Connector .NET where the checks against the Certificate Revocation List (CRL) were not performed where the insecureMode flag was set to false, which is the default setting. The vulnerability affects versions between 2.0.25 and 2.1.4 (inclusive). Snowflake fixed the issue in version 2.1.5. | |||||
| CVE-2023-1514 | 1 Hitachienergy | 1 Rtu500 Scripting Interface | 2023-12-28 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| A vulnerability exists in the component RTU500 Scripting interface. When a client connects to a server using TLS, the server presents a certificate. This certificate links a public key to the identity of the service and is signed by a Certification Authority (CA), allowing the client to validate that the remote service can be trusted and is not malicious. If the client does not validate the parameters of the certificate, then attackers could be able to spoof the identity of the service. An attacker could exploit the vulnerability by using faking the identity of a RTU500 device and intercepting the messages initiated via the RTU500 Scripting interface. | |||||