Total
59 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2022-39173 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolfssl | 2025-05-20 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| In wolfSSL before 5.5.1, malicious clients can cause a buffer overflow during a TLS 1.3 handshake. This occurs when an attacker supposedly resumes a previous TLS session. During the resumption Client Hello a Hello Retry Request must be triggered. Both Client Hellos are required to contain a list of duplicate cipher suites to trigger the buffer overflow. In total, two Client Hellos have to be sent: one in the resumed session, and a second one as a response to a Hello Retry Request message. | |||||
| CVE-2022-42961 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolfssl | 2025-05-14 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| An issue was discovered in wolfSSL before 5.5.0. A fault injection attack on RAM via Rowhammer leads to ECDSA key disclosure. Users performing signing operations with private ECC keys, such as in server-side TLS connections, might leak faulty ECC signatures. These signatures can be processed via an advanced technique for ECDSA key recovery. (In 5.5.0 and later, WOLFSSL_CHECK_SIG_FAULTS can be used to address the vulnerability.) | |||||
| CVE-2022-42905 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolfssl | 2025-05-02 | N/A | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| In wolfSSL before 5.5.2, if callback functions are enabled (via the WOLFSSL_CALLBACKS flag), then a malicious TLS 1.3 client or network attacker can trigger a buffer over-read on the heap of 5 bytes. (WOLFSSL_CALLBACKS is only intended for debugging.) | |||||
| CVE-2023-6936 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolfssl | 2025-03-26 | N/A | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| In wolfSSL prior to 5.6.6, if callback functions are enabled (via the WOLFSSL_CALLBACKS flag), then a malicious TLS client or network attacker can trigger a buffer over-read on the heap of 5 bytes (WOLFSSL_CALLBACKS is only intended for debugging). | |||||
| CVE-2023-6937 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolfssl | 2025-02-21 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| wolfSSL prior to 5.6.6 did not check that messages in one (D)TLS record do not span key boundaries. As a result, it was possible to combine (D)TLS messages using different keys into one (D)TLS record. The most extreme edge case is that, in (D)TLS 1.3, it was possible that an unencrypted (D)TLS 1.3 record from the server containing first a ServerHello message and then the rest of the first server flight would be accepted by a wolfSSL client. In (D)TLS 1.3 the handshake is encrypted after the ServerHello but a wolfSSL client would accept an unencrypted flight from the server. This does not compromise key negotiation and authentication so it is assigned a low severity rating. | |||||
| CVE-2024-5288 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolfssl | 2025-02-20 | N/A | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| An issue was discovered in wolfSSL before 5.7.0. A safe-error attack via Rowhammer, namely FAULT+PROBE, leads to ECDSA key disclosure. When WOLFSSL_CHECK_SIG_FAULTS is used in signing operations with private ECC keys, such as in server-side TLS connections, the connection is halted if any fault occurs. The success rate in a certain amount of connection requests can be processed via an advanced technique for ECDSA key recovery. | |||||
| CVE-2023-6935 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolfssl | 2024-11-07 | N/A | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| wolfSSL SP Math All RSA implementation is vulnerable to the Marvin Attack, new variation of a timing Bleichenbacher style attack, when built with the following options to configure: --enable-all CFLAGS="-DWOLFSSL_STATIC_RSA" The define “WOLFSSL_STATIC_RSA” enables static RSA cipher suites, which is not recommended, and has been disabled by default since wolfSSL 3.6.6. Therefore the default build since 3.6.6, even with "--enable-all", is not vulnerable to the Marvin Attack. The vulnerability is specific to static RSA cipher suites, and expected to be padding-independent. The vulnerability allows an attacker to decrypt ciphertexts and forge signatures after probing with a large number of test observations. However the server’s private key is not exposed. | |||||
| CVE-2024-5991 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolfssl | 2024-09-06 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| In function MatchDomainName(), input param str is treated as a NULL terminated string despite being user provided and unchecked. Specifically, the function X509_check_host() takes in a pointer and length to check against, with no requirements that it be NULL terminated. If a caller was attempting to do a name check on a non-NULL terminated buffer, the code would read beyond the bounds of the input array until it found a NULL terminator.This issue affects wolfSSL: through 5.7.0. | |||||
| CVE-2024-2881 | 3 Linux, Microsoft, Wolfssl | 3 Linux Kernel, Windows, Wolfssl | 2024-09-04 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| Fault Injection vulnerability in wc_ed25519_sign_msg function in wolfssl/wolfcrypt/src/ed25519.c in WolfSSL wolfssl5.6.6 on Linux/Windows allows remote attacker co-resides in the same system with a victim process to disclose information and escalate privileges via Rowhammer fault injection to the ed25519_key structure. | |||||
| CVE-2024-1545 | 3 Linux, Microsoft, Wolfssl | 3 Linux Kernel, Windows, Wolfssl | 2024-09-04 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| Fault Injection vulnerability in RsaPrivateDecryption function in wolfssl/wolfcrypt/src/rsa.c in WolfSSL wolfssl5.6.6 on Linux/Windows allows remote attacker co-resides in the same system with a victim process to disclose information and escalate privileges via Rowhammer fault injection to the RsaKey structure. | |||||
| CVE-2024-1543 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolfssl | 2024-09-04 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| The side-channel protected T-Table implementation in wolfSSL up to version 5.6.5 protects against a side-channel attacker with cache-line resolution. In a controlled environment such as Intel SGX, an attacker can gain a per instruction sub-cache-line resolution allowing them to break the cache-line-level protection. For details on the attack refer to: https://doi.org/10.46586/tches.v2024.i1.457-500 | |||||
| CVE-2022-25640 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolfssl | 2023-08-08 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| In wolfSSL before 5.2.0, a TLS 1.3 server cannot properly enforce a requirement for mutual authentication. A client can simply omit the certificate_verify message from the handshake, and never present a certificate. | |||||
| CVE-2023-3724 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolfssl | 2023-07-28 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| If a TLS 1.3 client gets neither a PSK (pre shared key) extension nor a KSE (key share extension) when connecting to a malicious server, a default predictable buffer gets used for the IKM (Input Keying Material) value when generating the session master secret. Using a potentially known IKM value when generating the session master secret key compromises the key generated, allowing an eavesdropper to reconstruct it and potentially allowing access to or meddling with message contents in the session. This issue does not affect client validation of connected servers, nor expose private key information, but could result in an insecure TLS 1.3 session when not controlling both sides of the connection. wolfSSL recommends that TLS 1.3 client side users update the version of wolfSSL used. | |||||
| CVE-2022-38153 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolfssl | 2023-03-01 | N/A | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| An issue was discovered in wolfSSL before 5.5.0 (when --enable-session-ticket is used); however, only version 5.3.0 is exploitable. Man-in-the-middle attackers or a malicious server can crash TLS 1.2 clients during a handshake. If an attacker injects a large ticket (more than 256 bytes) into a NewSessionTicket message in a TLS 1.2 handshake, and the client has a non-empty session cache, the session cache frees a pointer that points to unallocated memory, causing the client to crash with a "free(): invalid pointer" message. NOTE: It is likely that this is also exploitable during TLS 1.3 handshakes between a client and a malicious server. With TLS 1.3, it is not possible to exploit this as a man-in-the-middle. | |||||
| CVE-2022-38152 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolfssl | 2023-03-01 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in wolfSSL before 5.5.0. When a TLS 1.3 client connects to a wolfSSL server and SSL_clear is called on its session, the server crashes with a segmentation fault. This occurs in the second session, which is created through TLS session resumption and reuses the initial struct WOLFSSL. If the server reuses the previous session structure (struct WOLFSSL) by calling wolfSSL_clear(WOLFSSL* ssl) on it, the next received Client Hello (that resumes the previous session) crashes the server. Note that this bug is only triggered when resuming sessions using TLS session resumption. Only servers that use wolfSSL_clear instead of the recommended SSL_free; SSL_new sequence are affected. Furthermore, wolfSSL_clear is part of wolfSSL's compatibility layer and is not enabled by default. It is not part of wolfSSL's native API. | |||||
| CVE-2017-2800 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolfssl | 2023-01-28 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| A specially crafted x509 certificate can cause a single out of bounds byte overwrite in wolfSSL through 3.10.2 resulting in potential certificate validation vulnerabilities, denial of service and possible remote code execution. In order to trigger this vulnerability, the attacker needs to supply a malicious x509 certificate to either a server or a client application using this library. | |||||
| CVE-2020-15309 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolfssl | 2022-11-16 | 6.9 MEDIUM | 7.0 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in wolfSSL before 4.5.0, when single precision is not employed. Local attackers can conduct a cache-timing attack against public key operations. These attackers may already have obtained sensitive information if the affected system has been used for private key operations (e.g., signing with a private key). | |||||
| CVE-2016-7440 | 4 Debian, Mariadb, Oracle and 1 more | 4 Debian Linux, Mariadb, Mysql and 1 more | 2022-10-27 | 2.1 LOW | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| The C software implementation of AES Encryption and Decryption in wolfSSL (formerly CyaSSL) before 3.9.10 makes it easier for local users to discover AES keys by leveraging cache-bank timing differences. | |||||
| CVE-2021-44718 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolfssl | 2022-09-08 | N/A | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| wolfSSL through 5.0.0 allows an attacker to cause a denial of service and infinite loop in the client component by sending crafted traffic from a Machine-in-the-Middle (MITM) position. The root cause is that the client module accepts TLS messages that normally are only sent to TLS servers. | |||||
| CVE-2015-7744 | 3 Mariadb, Opensuse, Wolfssl | 4 Mariadb, Leap, Opensuse and 1 more | 2022-08-29 | 2.6 LOW | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| wolfSSL (formerly CyaSSL) before 3.6.8 does not properly handle faults associated with the Chinese Remainder Theorem (CRT) process when allowing ephemeral key exchange without low memory optimizations on a server, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain private RSA keys by capturing TLS handshakes, aka a Lenstra attack. | |||||