Total
304758 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-23227 | 3 Ibm, Linux, Microsoft | 4 Aix, Tivoli Application Dependency Discovery Manager, Linux Kernel and 1 more | 2025-08-15 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| IBM Tivoli Application Dependency Discovery Manager 7.3.0.0 through 7.3.0.11 is vulnerable to stored cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows authenticated users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. | |||||
| CVE-2025-0413 | 1 Parallels | 2 Parallels, Remote Application Server | 2025-08-15 | N/A | N/A |
| Parallels Desktop Technical Data Reporter Link Following Local Privilege Escalation Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows local attackers to escalate privileges on affected installations of Parallels Desktop. An attacker must first obtain the ability to execute low-privileged code on the target host system in order to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the Technical Data Reporter component. By creating a symbolic link, an attacker can abuse the service to change the permissions of arbitrary files. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to escalate privileges and execute arbitrary code in the context of root. Was ZDI-CAN-25014. | |||||
| CVE-2024-54176 | 1 Ibm | 2 Devops Deploy, Urbancode Deploy | 2025-08-15 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| IBM DevOps Deploy 8.0 through 8.0.1.4, 8.1 through 8.1.0.0 and IBM UrbanCode Deploy (UCD) 7.0 through 7.0.5.25, 7.1 through 7.1.2.21, 7.2 through 7.2.3.14 and 7.3 through 7.3.2 could allow an authenticated user to obtain sensitive information about other users on the system due to missing authorization for a function. | |||||
| CVE-2025-53744 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortios | 2025-08-15 | N/A | N/A |
| An incorrect privilege assignment vulnerability [CWE-266] in FortiOS Security Fabric version 7.6.0 through 7.6.2, 7.4.0 through 7.4.7, 7.2 all versions, 7.0 all versions, 6.4 all versions, may allow a remote authenticated attacker with high privileges to escalate their privileges to super-admin via registering the device to a malicious FortiManager. | |||||
| CVE-2025-52970 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortiweb | 2025-08-15 | N/A | N/A |
| A improper handling of parameters in Fortinet FortiWeb versions 7.6.3 and below, versions 7.4.7 and below, versions 7.2.10 and below, and 7.0.10 and below may allow an unauthenticated remote attacker with non-public information pertaining to the device and targeted user to gain admin privileges on the device via a specially crafted request. | |||||
| CVE-2025-49813 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortiadc | 2025-08-15 | N/A | N/A |
| An improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS Command ("OS Command Injection") vulnerability [CWE-78] in Fortinet FortiADC version 7.2.0 and before 7.1.1 allows a remote and authenticated attacker with low privilege to execute unauthorized code via specifically crafted HTTP parameters. | |||||
| CVE-2025-32932 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortisoar | 2025-08-15 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| An Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') vulnerability [CWE-79] in FortiSOAR version 7.6.1 and below, version 7.5.1 and below, 7.4 all versions, 7.3 all versions, 7.2 all versions, 7.0 all versions, 6.4 all versions WEB UI may allow an authenticated remote attacker to perform an XSS attack via stored malicious service requests | |||||
| CVE-2025-47857 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortiweb | 2025-08-15 | N/A | N/A |
| A improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection') vulnerability [CWE-78] in Fortinet FortiWeb CLI version 7.6.0 through 7.6.3 and before 7.4.8 allows a privileged attacker to execute arbitrary code or command via crafted CLI commands. | |||||
| CVE-2025-8800 | 1 Open5gs | 1 Open5gs | 2025-08-15 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| A vulnerability has been found in Open5GS up to 2.7.5. Affected by this issue is the function esm_handle_pdn_connectivity_request of the file src/mme/esm-handler.c of the component AMF Component. The manipulation leads to denial of service. The attack may be launched remotely. Upgrading to version 2.7.6 is able to address this issue. The name of the patch is 701505102f514cbde2856cd2ebc9bedb7efc820d. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. | |||||
| CVE-2025-8452 | 2025-08-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| By using the "uscan" protocol provided by the eSCL specification, an attacker can discover the serial number of multi-function printers that implement the Brother-provided firmware. This serial number can, in turn, can be leveraged by the flaw described by CVE-2024-51978 to calculate the default administrator password. This flaw is similar to CVE-2024-51977, with the only difference being the protocol by which an attacker can use to learn the remote device's serial number. The eSCL/uscan vector is typically only exposed on the local network. Any discovery service that implements the eSCL specification can be used to exploit this vulnerability, and one such implementation is the runZero Explorer. Changing the default administrator password will render this vulnerability virtually worthless, since the calculated default administrator password would no longer be the correct password. | |||||
| CVE-2021-27922 | 2 Fedoraproject, Python | 2 Fedora, Pillow | 2025-08-15 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Pillow before 8.1.2 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) because the reported size of a contained image is not properly checked for an ICNS container, and thus an attempted memory allocation can be very large. | |||||
| CVE-2021-27921 | 2 Fedoraproject, Python | 2 Fedora, Pillow | 2025-08-15 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Pillow before 8.1.2 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) because the reported size of a contained image is not properly checked for a BLP container, and thus an attempted memory allocation can be very large. | |||||
| CVE-2021-27923 | 2 Fedoraproject, Python | 2 Fedora, Pillow | 2025-08-15 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Pillow before 8.1.2 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) because the reported size of a contained image is not properly checked for an ICO container, and thus an attempted memory allocation can be very large. | |||||
| CVE-2025-55718 | 2025-08-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: Not used | |||||
| CVE-2025-55726 | 2025-08-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: Not used | |||||
| CVE-2025-55722 | 2025-08-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: Not used | |||||
| CVE-2025-55721 | 2025-08-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: Not used | |||||
| CVE-2025-55725 | 2025-08-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: Not used | |||||
| CVE-2025-55719 | 2025-08-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: Not used | |||||
| CVE-2025-55723 | 2025-08-15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: Not used | |||||