Filtered by vendor Pulsesecure
Subscribe
Total
93 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2016-4791 | 2 Ivanti, Pulsesecure | 2 Connect Secure, Pulse Connect Secure | 2024-02-27 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 8.6 HIGH |
| The administrative user interface in Pulse Connect Secure (PCS) 8.2 before 8.2r1, 8.1 before 8.1r2, 8.0 before 8.0r9, and 7.4 before 7.4r13.4 allows remote administrators to enumerate files, read arbitrary files, and conduct server side request forgery (SSRF) attacks via unspecified vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2020-12880 | 2 Ivanti, Pulsesecure | 4 Connect Secure, Policy Secure, Pulse Connect Secure and 1 more | 2024-02-27 | 2.1 LOW | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| An issue was discovered in Pulse Policy Secure (PPS) and Pulse Connect Secure (PCS) Virtual Appliance before 9.1R8. By manipulating a certain kernel boot parameter, it can be tricked into dropping into a root shell in a pre-install phase where the entire source code of the appliance is available and can be retrieved. (The source code is otherwise inaccessible because the appliance has its hard disks encrypted, and no root shell is available during normal operation.) | |||||
| CVE-2021-22937 | 2 Ivanti, Pulsesecure | 2 Connect Secure, Pulse Connect Secure | 2024-02-27 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 7.2 HIGH |
| A vulnerability in Pulse Connect Secure before 9.1R12 could allow an authenticated administrator to perform a file write via a maliciously crafted archive uploaded in the administrator web interface. | |||||
| CVE-2019-11540 | 2 Ivanti, Pulsesecure | 3 Connect Secure, Pulse Connect Secure, Pulse Policy Secure | 2024-02-27 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| In Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure version 9.0RX before 9.0R3.4 and 8.3RX before 8.3R7.1 and Pulse Policy Secure version 9.0RX before 9.0R3.2 and 5.4RX before 5.4R7.1, an unauthenticated, remote attacker can conduct a session hijacking attack. | |||||
| CVE-2021-22965 | 2 Ivanti, Pulsesecure | 2 Connect Secure, Pulse Connect Secure | 2024-02-27 | 7.8 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| A vulnerability in Pulse Connect Secure before 9.1R12.1 could allow an unauthenticated administrator to causes a denial of service when a malformed request is sent to the device. | |||||
| CVE-2021-22935 | 2 Ivanti, Pulsesecure | 2 Connect Secure, Pulse Connect Secure | 2024-02-27 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 7.2 HIGH |
| A vulnerability in Pulse Connect Secure before 9.1R12 could allow an authenticated administrator to perform command injection via an unsanitized web parameter. | |||||
| CVE-2020-15352 | 2 Ivanti, Pulsesecure | 4 Connect Secure, Policy Secure, Pulse Connect Secure and 1 more | 2024-02-27 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 7.2 HIGH |
| An XML external entity (XXE) vulnerability in Pulse Connect Secure (PCS) before 9.1R9 and Pulse Policy Secure (PPS) before 9.1R9 allows remote authenticated admins to conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks via a crafted DTD in an XML request. | |||||
| CVE-2018-20814 | 2 Ivanti, Pulsesecure | 2 Connect Secure, Pulse Policy Secure | 2024-02-27 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| An XSS issue was found with Psaldownload.cgi in Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure (PCS) 8.3R2 before 8.3R2 and Pulse Policy Secure (PPS) 5.4RX before 5.4R2. This is not applicable to PCS 8.1RX or PPS 5.2RX. | |||||
| CVE-2016-4787 | 2 Ivanti, Pulsesecure | 2 Connect Secure, Pulse Connect Secure | 2024-02-27 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 10.0 CRITICAL |
| Pulse Connect Secure (PCS) 8.2 before 8.2r1, 8.1 before 8.1r2, 8.0 before 8.0r10, and 7.4 before 7.4r13.4 allow remote attackers to read sensitive system authentication files in an unspecified directory via unknown vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2018-18284 | 5 Artifex, Canonical, Debian and 2 more | 11 Ghostscript, Gpl Ghostscript, Ubuntu Linux and 8 more | 2023-11-07 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.6 HIGH |
| Artifex Ghostscript 9.25 and earlier allows attackers to bypass a sandbox protection mechanism via vectors involving the 1Policy operator. | |||||
| CVE-2018-15911 | 5 Artifex, Canonical, Debian and 2 more | 11 Ghostscript, Gpl Ghostscript, Ubuntu Linux and 8 more | 2023-11-07 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| In Artifex Ghostscript 9.23 before 2018-08-24, attackers able to supply crafted PostScript could use uninitialized memory access in the aesdecode operator to crash the interpreter or potentially execute code. | |||||
| CVE-2018-15910 | 5 Artifex, Canonical, Debian and 2 more | 9 Ghostscript, Gpl Ghostscript, Ubuntu Linux and 6 more | 2023-11-07 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| In Artifex Ghostscript before 9.24, attackers able to supply crafted PostScript files could use a type confusion in the LockDistillerParams parameter to crash the interpreter or execute code. | |||||
| CVE-2018-15909 | 5 Artifex, Canonical, Debian and 2 more | 11 Ghostscript, Gpl Ghostscript, Ubuntu Linux and 8 more | 2023-11-07 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| In Artifex Ghostscript 9.23 before 2018-08-24, a type confusion using the .shfill operator could be used by attackers able to supply crafted PostScript files to crash the interpreter or potentially execute code. | |||||
| CVE-2018-16513 | 4 Artifex, Canonical, Debian and 1 more | 5 Ghostscript, Gpl Ghostscript, Ubuntu Linux and 2 more | 2023-11-07 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| In Artifex Ghostscript before 9.24, attackers able to supply crafted PostScript files could use a type confusion in the setcolor function to crash the interpreter or possibly have unspecified other impact. | |||||
| CVE-2016-0799 | 2 Openssl, Pulsesecure | 3 Openssl, Client, Steel Belted Radius | 2023-11-07 | 10.0 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| The fmtstr function in crypto/bio/b_print.c in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1s and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2g improperly calculates string lengths, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (overflow and out-of-bounds read) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a long string, as demonstrated by a large amount of ASN.1 data, a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-2842. | |||||
| CVE-2016-0800 | 2 Openssl, Pulsesecure | 3 Openssl, Client, Steel Belted Radius | 2022-12-13 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| The SSLv2 protocol, as used in OpenSSL before 1.0.1s and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2g and other products, requires a server to send a ServerVerify message before establishing that a client possesses certain plaintext RSA data, which makes it easier for remote attackers to decrypt TLS ciphertext data by leveraging a Bleichenbacher RSA padding oracle, aka a "DROWN" attack. | |||||
| CVE-2021-31922 | 1 Pulsesecure | 1 Virtual Traffic Manager | 2022-07-12 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| An HTTP Request Smuggling vulnerability in Pulse Secure Virtual Traffic Manager before 21.1 could allow an attacker to smuggle an HTTP request through an HTTP/2 Header. This vulnerability is resolved in 21.1, 20.3R1, 20.2R1, 20.1R2, 19.2R4, and 18.2R3. | |||||
| CVE-2016-2408 | 2 Microsoft, Pulsesecure | 5 Windows, Odyssey Access Client, Pulse Secure Desktop and 2 more | 2022-02-18 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| Pulse Secure Desktop before 5.2R2 and Pulse Secure Installer Service before 8.2R2 and below for Windows allow restricted users to gain privileges via unspecified vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2020-11581 | 4 Apple, Linux, Oracle and 1 more | 5 Macos, Linux Kernel, Solaris and 2 more | 2021-09-16 | 9.3 HIGH | 8.1 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure (PCS) through 2020-04-06. The applet in tncc.jar, executed on macOS, Linux, and Solaris clients when a Host Checker policy is enforced, allows a man-in-the-middle attacker to perform OS command injection attacks (against a client) via shell metacharacters to the doCustomRemediateInstructions method, because Runtime.getRuntime().exec() is used. | |||||
| CVE-2020-11582 | 4 Apple, Linux, Oracle and 1 more | 5 Macos, Linux Kernel, Solaris and 2 more | 2021-09-16 | 3.3 LOW | 8.8 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure (PCS) through 2020-04-06. The applet in tncc.jar, executed on macOS, Linux, and Solaris clients when a Host Checker policy is enforced, launches a TCP server that accepts local connections on a random port. This can be reached by local HTTP clients, because up to 25 invalid lines are ignored, and because DNS rebinding can occur. (This server accepts, for example, a setcookie command that might be relevant to CVE-2020-11581 exploitation.) | |||||