Filtered by vendor Octopus
Subscribe
Total
98 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2021-31816 | 1 Octopus | 1 Server | 2023-11-07 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| When configuring Octopus Server if it is configured with an external SQL database, on initial configuration the database password is written to the OctopusServer.txt log file in plaintext. | |||||
| CVE-2021-31817 | 1 Octopus | 1 Server | 2023-11-07 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| When configuring Octopus Server if it is configured with an external SQL database, on initial configuration the database password is written to the OctopusServer.txt log file in plaintext. | |||||
| CVE-2021-30183 | 1 Octopus | 1 Server | 2023-11-07 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Cleartext storage of sensitive information in multiple versions of Octopus Server where in certain situations when running import or export processes, the password used to encrypt and decrypt sensitive values would be written to the logs in plaintext. | |||||
| CVE-2021-26556 | 1 Octopus | 2 Octopus Deploy, Octopus Server | 2023-11-07 | 4.4 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| When Octopus Server is installed using a custom folder location, folder ACLs are not set correctly and could lead to an unprivileged user using DLL side-loading to gain privileged access. | |||||
| CVE-2021-26557 | 1 Octopus | 1 Tentacle | 2023-11-07 | 4.4 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| When Octopus Tentacle is installed using a custom folder location, folder ACLs are not set correctly and could lead to an unprivileged user using DLL side-loading to gain privileged access. | |||||
| CVE-2022-2781 | 1 Octopus | 1 Octopus Server | 2023-08-08 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| In affected versions of Octopus Server it was identified that the same encryption process was used for both encrypting session cookies and variables. | |||||
| CVE-2022-1901 | 3 Linux, Microsoft, Octopus | 3 Linux Kernel, Windows, Octopus Server | 2023-08-08 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible to unmask sensitive variables by using variable preview. | |||||
| CVE-2022-1502 | 1 Octopus | 1 Server | 2023-08-08 | 3.5 LOW | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| Permissions were not properly verified in the API on projects using version control in Git. This allowed projects to be modified by users with only ProjectView permissions. | |||||
| CVE-2022-2783 | 1 Octopus | 1 Octopus Server | 2023-08-08 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| In affected versions of Octopus Server it was identified that a session cookie could be used as the CSRF token | |||||
| CVE-2022-2346 | 1 Octopus | 1 Octopus Server | 2023-08-07 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible for a low privileged guest user to interact with extension endpoints. | |||||
| CVE-2022-2416 | 1 Octopus | 1 Octopus Server | 2023-08-04 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible for a low privileged guest user to craft a request that allows enumeration/recon of an environment. | |||||
| CVE-2022-2528 | 1 Octopus | 1 Octopus Server | 2022-09-15 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible to upload a package to built-in feed with insufficient permissions after re-indexing packages. | |||||
| CVE-2022-2075 | 3 Linux, Microsoft, Octopus | 3 Linux Kernel, Windows, Octopus Server | 2022-08-20 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible to perform a Regex Denial of Service targeting the build information request validation. | |||||
| CVE-2022-2049 | 3 Linux, Microsoft, Octopus | 3 Linux Kernel, Windows, Octopus Server | 2022-08-20 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible to perform a Regex Denial of Service via the package upload function. | |||||
| CVE-2022-2074 | 3 Linux, Microsoft, Octopus | 3 Linux Kernel, Windows, Octopus Server | 2022-08-20 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible to perform a Regex Denial of Service using the Variable Project Template. | |||||
| CVE-2022-30532 | 3 Linux, Microsoft, Octopus | 3 Linux Kernel, Windows, Octopus Server | 2022-08-18 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| In affected versions of Octopus Deploy, there is no logging of changes to artifacts within Octopus Deploy. | |||||
| CVE-2022-29890 | 1 Octopus | 1 Octopus Server | 2022-08-02 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| In affected versions of Octopus Server the help sidebar can be customized to include a Cross-Site Scripting payload in the support link. | |||||
| CVE-2022-1670 | 1 Octopus | 1 Octopus Server | 2022-07-27 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| When generating a user invitation code in Octopus Server, the validity of this code can be set for a specific number of users. It was possible to bypass this restriction of validity to create extra user accounts above the initial number of invited users. | |||||
| CVE-2022-1881 | 1 Octopus | 1 Octopus Server | 2022-07-27 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| In affected versions of Octopus Server an Insecure Direct Object Reference vulnerability exists where it is possible for a user to download Project Exports from a Project they do not have permissions to access. This vulnerability only impacts projects within the same Space. | |||||
| CVE-2019-15507 | 1 Octopus | 1 Server | 2022-07-27 | 3.5 LOW | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| In Octopus Deploy versions 2018.8.4 to 2019.7.6, when a web request proxy is configured, an authenticated user (in certain limited special-characters circumstances) could trigger a deployment that writes the web request proxy password to the deployment log in cleartext. This is fixed in 2019.7.7. The fix was back-ported to LTS 2019.6.7 as well as LTS 2019.3.8. | |||||