Filtered by vendor Djangoproject
Subscribe
Total
119 CVE
CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2019-14232 | 2 Djangoproject, Opensuse | 2 Django, Leap | 2024-07-03 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
An issue was discovered in Django 1.11.x before 1.11.23, 2.1.x before 2.1.11, and 2.2.x before 2.2.4. If django.utils.text.Truncator's chars() and words() methods were passed the html=True argument, they were extremely slow to evaluate certain inputs due to a catastrophic backtracking vulnerability in a regular expression. The chars() and words() methods are used to implement the truncatechars_html and truncatewords_html template filters, which were thus vulnerable. | |||||
CVE-2023-43665 | 2 Djangoproject, Fedoraproject | 2 Django, Fedora | 2024-05-01 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
In Django 3.2 before 3.2.22, 4.1 before 4.1.12, and 4.2 before 4.2.6, the django.utils.text.Truncator chars() and words() methods (when used with html=True) are subject to a potential DoS (denial of service) attack via certain inputs with very long, potentially malformed HTML text. The chars() and words() methods are used to implement the truncatechars_html and truncatewords_html template filters, which are thus also vulnerable. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2019-14232. | |||||
CVE-2023-41164 | 2 Djangoproject, Fedoraproject | 2 Django, Fedora | 2024-04-20 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
In Django 3.2 before 3.2.21, 4.1 before 4.1.11, and 4.2 before 4.2.5, django.utils.encoding.uri_to_iri() is subject to a potential DoS (denial of service) attack via certain inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters. | |||||
CVE-2023-46695 | 1 Djangoproject | 1 Django | 2023-12-14 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
An issue was discovered in Django 3.2 before 3.2.23, 4.1 before 4.1.13, and 4.2 before 4.2.7. The NFKC normalization is slow on Windows. As a consequence, django.contrib.auth.forms.UsernameField is subject to a potential DoS (denial of service) attack via certain inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters. | |||||
CVE-2018-7536 | 4 Canonical, Debian, Djangoproject and 1 more | 4 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Django and 1 more | 2023-12-07 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
An issue was discovered in Django 2.0 before 2.0.3, 1.11 before 1.11.11, and 1.8 before 1.8.19. The django.utils.html.urlize() function was extremely slow to evaluate certain inputs due to catastrophic backtracking vulnerabilities in two regular expressions (only one regular expression for Django 1.8.x). The urlize() function is used to implement the urlize and urlizetrunc template filters, which were thus vulnerable. | |||||
CVE-2021-33571 | 2 Djangoproject, Fedoraproject | 2 Django, Fedora | 2023-12-07 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
In Django 2.2 before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2 before 3.2.4, URLValidator, validate_ipv4_address, and validate_ipv46_address do not prohibit leading zero characters in octal literals. This may allow a bypass of access control that is based on IP addresses. (validate_ipv4_address and validate_ipv46_address are unaffected with Python 3.9.5+..) . | |||||
CVE-2021-31542 | 3 Debian, Djangoproject, Fedoraproject | 3 Debian Linux, Django, Fedora | 2023-12-07 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
In Django 2.2 before 2.2.21, 3.1 before 3.1.9, and 3.2 before 3.2.1, MultiPartParser, UploadedFile, and FieldFile allowed directory traversal via uploaded files with suitably crafted file names. | |||||
CVE-2022-23833 | 3 Debian, Djangoproject, Fedoraproject | 3 Debian Linux, Django, Fedora | 2023-11-22 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
An issue was discovered in MultiPartParser in Django 2.2 before 2.2.27, 3.2 before 3.2.12, and 4.0 before 4.0.2. Passing certain inputs to multipart forms could result in an infinite loop when parsing files. | |||||
CVE-2022-36359 | 2 Debian, Djangoproject | 2 Debian Linux, Django | 2023-11-07 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
An issue was discovered in the HTTP FileResponse class in Django 3.2 before 3.2.15 and 4.0 before 4.0.7. An application is vulnerable to a reflected file download (RFD) attack that sets the Content-Disposition header of a FileResponse when the filename is derived from user-supplied input. | |||||
CVE-2022-34265 | 1 Djangoproject | 1 Django | 2023-11-07 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
An issue was discovered in Django 3.2 before 3.2.14 and 4.0 before 4.0.6. The Trunc() and Extract() database functions are subject to SQL injection if untrusted data is used as a kind/lookup_name value. Applications that constrain the lookup name and kind choice to a known safe list are unaffected. | |||||
CVE-2022-28346 | 2 Debian, Djangoproject | 2 Debian Linux, Django | 2023-11-07 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. QuerySet.annotate(), aggregate(), and extra() methods are subject to SQL injection in column aliases via a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the passed **kwargs. | |||||
CVE-2022-28347 | 2 Debian, Djangoproject | 2 Debian Linux, Django | 2023-11-07 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
A SQL injection issue was discovered in QuerySet.explain() in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. This occurs by passing a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the **options argument, and placing the injection payload in an option name. | |||||
CVE-2022-22818 | 3 Debian, Djangoproject, Fedoraproject | 3 Debian Linux, Django, Fedora | 2023-11-07 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
The {% debug %} template tag in Django 2.2 before 2.2.27, 3.2 before 3.2.12, and 4.0 before 4.0.2 does not properly encode the current context. This may lead to XSS. | |||||
CVE-2021-45452 | 2 Djangoproject, Fedoraproject | 2 Django, Fedora | 2023-11-07 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
Storage.save in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1 allows directory traversal if crafted filenames are directly passed to it. | |||||
CVE-2021-44420 | 5 Canonical, Debian, Djangoproject and 2 more | 5 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Django and 2 more | 2023-11-07 | 7.5 HIGH | 7.3 HIGH |
In Django 2.2 before 2.2.25, 3.1 before 3.1.14, and 3.2 before 3.2.10, HTTP requests for URLs with trailing newlines could bypass upstream access control based on URL paths. | |||||
CVE-2021-45115 | 2 Djangoproject, Fedoraproject | 2 Django, Fedora | 2023-11-07 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.26, 3.2 before 3.2.11, and 4.0 before 4.0.1. UserAttributeSimilarityValidator incurred significant overhead in evaluating a submitted password that was artificially large in relation to the comparison values. In a situation where access to user registration was unrestricted, this provided a potential vector for a denial-of-service attack. | |||||
CVE-2021-3281 | 3 Djangoproject, Fedoraproject, Netapp | 3 Django, Fedora, Snapcenter | 2023-11-07 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
In Django 2.2 before 2.2.18, 3.0 before 3.0.12, and 3.1 before 3.1.6, the django.utils.archive.extract method (used by "startapp --template" and "startproject --template") allows directory traversal via an archive with absolute paths or relative paths with dot segments. | |||||
CVE-2021-35042 | 2 Djangoproject, Fedoraproject | 2 Django, Fedora | 2023-11-07 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
Django 3.1.x before 3.1.13 and 3.2.x before 3.2.5 allows QuerySet.order_by SQL injection if order_by is untrusted input from a client of a web application. | |||||
CVE-2021-32052 | 3 Djangoproject, Fedoraproject, Python | 3 Django, Fedora, Python | 2023-11-07 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
In Django 2.2 before 2.2.22, 3.1 before 3.1.10, and 3.2 before 3.2.2 (with Python 3.9.5+), URLValidator does not prohibit newlines and tabs (unless the URLField form field is used). If an application uses values with newlines in an HTTP response, header injection can occur. Django itself is unaffected because HttpResponse prohibits newlines in HTTP headers. | |||||
CVE-2021-33203 | 2 Djangoproject, Fedoraproject | 2 Django, Fedora | 2023-11-07 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 4.9 MEDIUM |
Django before 2.2.24, 3.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2.x before 3.2.4 has a potential directory traversal via django.contrib.admindocs. Staff members could use the TemplateDetailView view to check the existence of arbitrary files. Additionally, if (and only if) the default admindocs templates have been customized by application developers to also show file contents, then not only the existence but also the file contents would have been exposed. In other words, there is directory traversal outside of the template root directories. |