Total
8212 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2021-41782 | 2 Foxit, Microsoft | 4 Pdf Editor, Pdf Reader, Phantompdf and 1 more | 2022-09-02 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| Foxit PDF Reader before 11.1 and PDF Editor before 11.1, and PhantomPDF before 10.1.6, allow attackers to trigger a use-after-free and execute arbitrary code because JavaScript is mishandled. | |||||
| CVE-2021-41781 | 2 Foxit, Microsoft | 4 Pdf Editor, Pdf Reader, Phantompdf and 1 more | 2022-09-02 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| Foxit PDF Reader before 11.1 and PDF Editor before 11.1, and PhantomPDF before 10.1.6, allow attackers to trigger a use-after-free and execute arbitrary code because JavaScript is mishandled. | |||||
| CVE-2021-41785 | 2 Foxit, Microsoft | 4 Pdf Editor, Pdf Reader, Phantompdf and 1 more | 2022-09-02 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| Foxit PDF Reader before 11.1 and PDF Editor before 11.1, and PhantomPDF before 10.1.6, allow attackers to trigger a use-after-free and execute arbitrary code because JavaScript is mishandled. | |||||
| CVE-2021-41783 | 2 Foxit, Microsoft | 4 Pdf Editor, Pdf Reader, Phantompdf and 1 more | 2022-09-02 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| Foxit PDF Reader before 11.1 and PDF Editor before 11.1, and PhantomPDF before 10.1.6, allow attackers to trigger a use-after-free and execute arbitrary code because JavaScript is mishandled. | |||||
| CVE-2021-41784 | 2 Foxit, Microsoft | 4 Pdf Editor, Pdf Reader, Phantompdf and 1 more | 2022-09-02 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| Foxit PDF Reader before 11.1 and PDF Editor before 11.1, and PhantomPDF before 10.1.6, allow attackers to trigger a use-after-free and execute arbitrary code because JavaScript is mishandled. | |||||
| CVE-2022-28681 | 2 Foxit, Microsoft | 3 Pdf Editor, Pdf Reader, Windows | 2022-08-25 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to disclose sensitive information on affected installations of Foxit PDF Reader 11.2.1.53537. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the deletePages method. By performing actions in JavaScript, an attacker can trigger a read past the end of an allocated object. An attacker can leverage this in conjunction with other vulnerabilities to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-16825. | |||||
| CVE-2022-28670 | 2 Foxit, Microsoft | 3 Pdf Editor, Pdf Reader, Windows | 2022-08-25 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to disclose sensitive information on affected installations of Foxit PDF Reader 11.2.1.53537. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the processing of AcroForms. Crafted data in an AcroForm can trigger a read past the end of an allocated buffer. An attacker can leverage this in conjunction with other vulnerabilities to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-16523. | |||||
| CVE-2022-28678 | 2 Foxit, Microsoft | 3 Pdf Editor, Pdf Reader, Windows | 2022-08-25 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PDF Reader 11.2.1.53537. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of Doc objects. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-16805. | |||||
| CVE-2022-28679 | 2 Foxit, Microsoft | 3 Pdf Editor, Pdf Reader, Windows | 2022-08-25 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PDF Reader 11.2.1.53537. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of Annotation objects. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-16861. | |||||
| CVE-2022-28680 | 2 Foxit, Microsoft | 2 Pdf Editor, Windows | 2022-08-25 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PDF Reader 11.2.1.53537. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of Annotation objects. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-16821. | |||||
| CVE-2022-28883 | 3 Apple, F-secure, Microsoft | 9 Macos, Atlant, Cloud Protection For Salesforce and 6 more | 2022-08-25 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| A Denial-of-Service (DoS) vulnerability was discovered in F-Secure & WithSecure products whereby the aerdl unpack function crashes. This can lead to a possible scanning engine crash. The exploit can be triggered remotely by an attacker. | |||||
| CVE-2022-28882 | 3 Apple, F-secure, Microsoft | 9 Macos, Atlant, Cloud Protection For Salesforce and 6 more | 2022-08-25 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| A Denial-of-Service (DoS) vulnerability was discovered in F-Secure & WithSecure products whereby the aegen.dll will go into an infinite loop when unpacking PE files. This eventually leads to scanning engine crash. The exploit can be triggered remotely by an attacker. | |||||
| CVE-2021-21911 | 2 Advantech, Microsoft | 2 R-seenet, Windows | 2022-08-24 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| A privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Windows version of installation for Advantech R-SeeNet Advantech R-SeeNet 2.4.15 (30.07.2021). A specially-crafted file can be replaced in the system to escalate privileges to NT SYSTEM authority. An attacker can provide a malicious file to trigger this vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2022-22489 | 3 Ibm, Linux, Microsoft | 3 Mq, Linux Kernel, Windows | 2022-08-22 | N/A | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| IBM MQ 8.0, (9.0, 9.1, 9.2 LTS), and (9.1 and 9.2 CD) are vulnerable to an XML External Entity Injection (XXE) attack when processing XML data. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to expose sensitive information or consume memory resources. IBM X-Force ID: 226339. | |||||
| CVE-2022-36947 | 2 Faststone, Microsoft | 2 Image Viewer, Windows | 2022-08-20 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Unsafe Parsing of a PNG tRNS chunk in FastStone Image Viewer through 7.5 results in a stack buffer overflow. | |||||
| CVE-2022-2075 | 3 Linux, Microsoft, Octopus | 3 Linux Kernel, Windows, Octopus Server | 2022-08-20 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible to perform a Regex Denial of Service targeting the build information request validation. | |||||
| CVE-2022-2049 | 3 Linux, Microsoft, Octopus | 3 Linux Kernel, Windows, Octopus Server | 2022-08-20 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible to perform a Regex Denial of Service via the package upload function. | |||||
| CVE-2022-2074 | 3 Linux, Microsoft, Octopus | 3 Linux Kernel, Windows, Octopus Server | 2022-08-20 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible to perform a Regex Denial of Service using the Variable Project Template. | |||||
| CVE-2022-23764 | 2 Microsoft, Teruten | 2 Windows, Webcube | 2022-08-19 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| The vulnerability causing from insufficient verification procedures for downloaded files during WebCube update. Remote attackers can bypass this verification logic to update both digitally signed and unauthorized files, enabling remote code execution. | |||||
| CVE-2022-30532 | 3 Linux, Microsoft, Octopus | 3 Linux Kernel, Windows, Octopus Server | 2022-08-18 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| In affected versions of Octopus Deploy, there is no logging of changes to artifacts within Octopus Deploy. | |||||