Total
29527 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-37677 | 1 Access Management Specialist Project | 1 Access Management Specialist | 2024-07-03 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| An issue in Shenzhen Weitillage Industrial Co., Ltd the access management specialist V6.62.51215 allows a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information. | |||||
| CVE-2022-26581 | 1 Paxtechnology | 2 A930, Paydroid | 2024-07-03 | N/A | 6.8 MEDIUM |
| PAX A930 device with PayDroid_7.1.1_Virgo_V04.3.26T1_20210419 can allow an unauthorized attacker to perform privileged actions through the execution of specific binaries listed in ADB daemon. The attacker must have physical USB access to the device in order to exploit this vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2020-10673 | 4 Debian, Fasterxml, Netapp and 1 more | 31 Debian Linux, Jackson-databind, Steelstore Cloud Integrated Storage and 28 more | 2024-07-03 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| FasterXML jackson-databind 2.x before 2.9.10.4 mishandles the interaction between serialization gadgets and typing, related to com.caucho.config.types.ResourceRef (aka caucho-quercus). | |||||
| CVE-2020-10672 | 4 Debian, Fasterxml, Netapp and 1 more | 31 Debian Linux, Jackson-databind, Steelstore Cloud Integrated Storage and 28 more | 2024-07-03 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| FasterXML jackson-databind 2.x before 2.9.10.4 mishandles the interaction between serialization gadgets and typing, related to org.apache.aries.transaction.jms.internal.XaPooledConnectionFactory (aka aries.transaction.jms). | |||||
| CVE-2024-34595 | 1 Samsung | 1 Android | 2024-07-02 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| Improper access control in clickAdapterItem of SystemUI prior to SMR Jul-2024 Release 1 allows local attackers to launch privileged activities. | |||||
| CVE-2024-29060 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Visual Studio 2017, Visual Studio 2019, Visual Studio 2022 | 2024-07-02 | N/A | 6.7 MEDIUM |
| Visual Studio Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | |||||
| CVE-2006-0515 | 1 Cisco | 4 Adaptive Security Appliance Software, Firewall Services Module, Pix Firewall and 1 more | 2024-07-02 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
| Cisco PIX/ASA 7.1.x before 7.1(2) and 7.0.x before 7.0(5), PIX 6.3.x before 6.3.5(112), and FWSM 2.3.x before 2.3(4) and 3.x before 3.1(7), when used with Websense/N2H2, allows remote attackers to bypass HTTP access restrictions by splitting the GET method of an HTTP request into multiple packets, which prevents the request from being sent to Websense for inspection, aka bugs CSCsc67612, CSCsc68472, and CSCsd81734. | |||||
| CVE-2006-3906 | 1 Cisco | 21 Adaptive Security Appliance Software, Ios, Pix Asa Ids and 18 more | 2024-07-02 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Internet Key Exchange (IKE) version 1 protocol, as implemented on Cisco IOS, VPN 3000 Concentrators, and PIX firewalls, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (resource exhaustion) via a flood of IKE Phase-1 packets that exceed the session expiration rate. NOTE: it has been argued that this is due to a design weakness of the IKE version 1 protocol, in which case other vendors and implementations would also be affected. | |||||
| CVE-2005-4499 | 1 Cisco | 21 Adaptive Security Appliance Software, Pix Asa Ids, Pix Firewall and 18 more | 2024-07-02 | 7.5 HIGH | N/A |
| The Downloadable RADIUS ACLs feature in Cisco PIX and VPN 3000 concentrators, when creating an ACL on the Cisco Secure Access Control Server (CS ACS), generates a random internal name for an ACL that is also used as a hidden user name and password, which allows remote attackers to gain privileges by sniffing the username from the cleartext portion of a RADIUS session, then using the password to log in to another device that uses CS ACS. | |||||
| CVE-2005-3669 | 1 Cisco | 8 Adaptive Security Appliance Software, Firewall Services Module, Ios and 5 more | 2024-07-02 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in the Internet Key Exchange version 1 (IKEv1) implementation in multiple Cisco products allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reset) via certain malformed IKE packets, as demonstrated by the PROTOS ISAKMP Test Suite for IKEv1. NOTE: due to the lack of details in the Cisco advisory, it is unclear which of CVE-2005-3666, CVE-2005-3667, and/or CVE-2005-3668 this issue applies to. | |||||
| CVE-2002-0640 | 1 Openbsd | 1 Openssh | 2024-07-01 | 10.0 HIGH | N/A |
| Buffer overflow in sshd in OpenSSH 2.3.1 through 3.3 may allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a large number of responses during challenge response authentication when OpenBSD is using PAM modules with interactive keyboard authentication (PAMAuthenticationViaKbdInt). | |||||
| CVE-2003-0693 | 1 Openbsd | 1 Openssh | 2024-07-01 | 10.0 HIGH | N/A |
| A "buffer management error" in buffer_append_space of buffer.c for OpenSSH before 3.7 may allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by causing an incorrect amount of memory to be freed and corrupting the heap, a different vulnerability than CVE-2003-0695. | |||||
| CVE-2021-41035 | 1 Eclipse | 1 Openj9 | 2024-06-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| In Eclipse Openj9 before version 0.29.0, the JVM does not throw IllegalAccessError for MethodHandles that invoke inaccessible interface methods. | |||||
| CVE-2022-23541 | 1 Auth0 | 1 Jsonwebtoken | 2024-06-21 | N/A | 6.3 MEDIUM |
| jsonwebtoken is an implementation of JSON Web Tokens. Versions `<= 8.5.1` of `jsonwebtoken` library can be misconfigured so that passing a poorly implemented key retrieval function referring to the `secretOrPublicKey` argument from the readme link will result in incorrect verification of tokens. There is a possibility of using a different algorithm and key combination in verification, other than the one that was used to sign the tokens. Specifically, tokens signed with an asymmetric public key could be verified with a symmetric HS256 algorithm. This can lead to successful validation of forged tokens. If your application is supporting usage of both symmetric key and asymmetric key in jwt.verify() implementation with the same key retrieval function. This issue has been patched, please update to version 9.0.0. | |||||
| CVE-2024-30103 | 1 Microsoft | 3 365 Apps, Office, Outlook | 2024-06-20 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| Microsoft Outlook Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | |||||
| CVE-2024-35252 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Azure Storage Data Movement Library | 2024-06-20 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| Azure Storage Movement Client Library Denial of Service Vulnerability | |||||
| CVE-2024-34363 | 1 Envoyproxy | 1 Envoy | 2024-06-11 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| Envoy is a cloud-native, open source edge and service proxy. Due to how Envoy invoked the nlohmann JSON library, the library could throw an uncaught exception from downstream data if incomplete UTF-8 strings were serialized. The uncaught exception would cause Envoy to crash. | |||||
| CVE-2024-1272 | 1 Tnbmobil | 1 Cockpit | 2024-06-11 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| Inclusion of Sensitive Information in Source Code vulnerability in TNB Mobile Solutions Cockpit Software allows Retrieve Embedded Sensitive Data.This issue affects Cockpit Software: before v0.251.1. | |||||
| CVE-2024-4520 | 1 Gaizhenbiao | 1 Chuanhuchatgpt | 2024-06-11 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| An improper access control vulnerability exists in the gaizhenbiao/chuanhuchatgpt application, specifically in version 20240410. This vulnerability allows any user on the server to access the chat history of any other user without requiring any form of interaction between the users. Exploitation of this vulnerability could lead to data breaches, including the exposure of sensitive personal details, financial data, or confidential conversations. Additionally, it could facilitate identity theft and manipulation or fraud through the unauthorized access to users' chat histories. This issue is due to insufficient access control mechanisms in the application's handling of chat history data. | |||||
| CVE-2022-38773 | 1 Siemens | 140 Simatic Drive Controller Cpu 1504d Tf, Simatic Drive Controller Cpu 1504d Tf Firmware, Simatic Drive Controller Cpu 1507d Tf and 137 more | 2024-06-11 | N/A | 6.8 MEDIUM |
| Affected devices do not contain an Immutable Root of Trust in Hardware. With this the integrity of the code executed on the device can not be validated during load-time. An attacker with physical access to the device could use this to replace the boot image of the device and execute arbitrary code. | |||||