Total
34649 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-7725 | 2025-08-01 | N/A | 7.2 HIGH | ||
| The Photos, Files, YouTube, Twitter, Instagram, TikTok, Ecommerce Contest Gallery – Upload, Vote, Sell via PayPal or Stripe, Social Share Buttons, OpenAI plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the comment feature in all versions up to, and including, 26.1.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. | |||||
| CVE-2025-7845 | 2025-08-01 | N/A | 6.4 MEDIUM | ||
| The Stratum – Elementor Widgets plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's Advanced Google Maps and Image Hotspot widgets in all versions up to, and including, 1.6.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. | |||||
| CVE-2023-36390 | 1 Siemens | 22 Ruggedcom Rox Mx5000, Ruggedcom Rox Mx5000 Firmware, Ruggedcom Rox Mx5000re and 19 more | 2025-08-01 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000RE (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1400 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1500 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1501 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1510 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1511 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1512 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1524 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1536 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX5000 (All versions < V2.16.0). A reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the web interface of the affected application that could allow an attacker to execute malicious javascript code by tricking users into accessing a malicious link. The value is reflected in the response without sanitization while throwing an “invalid params element name” error on the action parameters. | |||||
| CVE-2024-13802 | 1 Bandsintown | 1 Events | 2025-08-01 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| The Bandsintown Events plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's 'bandsintown_events' shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.3.1 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. | |||||
| CVE-2024-1935 | 1 Rafflepress | 1 Rafflepress | 2025-08-01 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| The Giveaways and Contests by RafflePress – Get More Website Traffic, Email Subscribers, and Social Followers plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the ‘parent_url’ parameter in all versions up to, and including, 1.12.5 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. | |||||
| CVE-2025-4567 | 1 Infornweb | 1 Post Slider And Post Carousel | 2025-08-01 | N/A | N/A |
| The Post Slider and Post Carousel with Post Vertical Scrolling Widget WordPress plugin before 3.2.10 does not validate and escape some of its Widget options before outputting them back in a page/post where the block is embed, which could allow users with the contributor role and above to perform Stored Cross-Site Scripting attacks. | |||||
| CVE-2025-1303 | 1 Coffee-code | 1 Plugin Oficial | 2025-08-01 | N/A | N/A |
| The Plugin Oficial WordPress plugin through 1.7.3 does not sanitise and escape a parameter before outputting it back in the page, leading to a Reflected Cross-Site Scripting which could be used against only unauthenticated users. | |||||
| CVE-2025-1289 | 1 Coffee-code | 1 Plugin Oficial | 2025-08-01 | N/A | N/A |
| The Plugin Oficial WordPress plugin through 1.7.3 does not sanitise and escape some of its settings, which could allow high privilege users such as admin to perform Stored Cross-Site Scripting attacks even when the unfiltered_html capability is disallowed (for example in multisite setup). | |||||
| CVE-2025-47040 | 1 Adobe | 1 Experience Manager | 2025-08-01 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.22 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. | |||||
| CVE-2025-47042 | 1 Adobe | 1 Experience Manager | 2025-08-01 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.22 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. | |||||
| CVE-2025-47039 | 1 Adobe | 1 Experience Manager | 2025-08-01 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.22 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. | |||||
| CVE-2025-47041 | 1 Adobe | 1 Experience Manager | 2025-08-01 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.22 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. | |||||
| CVE-2025-0183 | 1 Binary-husky | 1 Gpt Academic | 2025-08-01 | N/A | N/A |
| A stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the Latex Proof-Reading Module of binary-husky/gpt_academic version 3.9.0. This vulnerability allows an attacker to inject malicious scripts into the `debug_log.html` file generated by the module. When an admin visits this debug report, the injected scripts can execute, potentially leading to unauthorized actions and data access. | |||||
| CVE-2024-8027 | 1 Youdao | 1 Qanything | 2025-08-01 | N/A | N/A |
| A stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in netease-youdao/QAnything. Attackers can upload malicious knowledge files to the knowledge base, which can trigger XSS attacks during user chats. This vulnerability affects all versions prior to the fix. | |||||
| CVE-2025-54589 | 2025-07-31 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Copyparty is a portable file server. In versions 1.18.6 and below, when accessing the recent uploads page at `/?ru`, users can filter the results using an input field at the top. This field appends a filter parameter to the URL, which reflects its value directly into a `<script>` block without proper escaping, allowing for reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) and can be exploited against both authenticated and unauthenticated users. This is fixed in version 1.18.7. | |||||
| CVE-2024-26157 | 1 Etictelecom | 1 Remote Access Server Firmware | 2025-07-31 | N/A | N/A |
| All versions of ETIC Telecom Remote Access Server (RAS) prior to 4.5.0 are vulnerable to reflected cross site scripting (XSS) attacks in get view method under view parameter. The ETIC RAS web server uses dynamic pages that get their input from the client side and reflect the input in their response to the client. | |||||
| CVE-2025-20147 | 1 Cisco | 1 Catalyst Sd-wan Manager | 2025-07-31 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Manager, formerly Cisco SD-WAN vManage, could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to conduct a stored cross-site scripting attack (XSS) on an affected system. This vulnerability is due to improper sanitization of user input to the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by submitting a malicious script through the interface. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to conduct a stored XSS attack on the affected system. | |||||
| CVE-2025-8211 | 1 Roothub | 1 Roothub | 2025-07-31 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability was found in Roothub up to 2.6. It has been declared as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is the function Edit of the file src/main/java/cn/roothub/web/admin/SystemConfigAdminController.java. The manipulation leads to cross site scripting. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. | |||||
| CVE-2025-20116 | 1 Cisco | 1 Application Policy Infrastructure Controller | 2025-07-31 | N/A | 4.8 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability in the web UI of Cisco APIC could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to perform a stored XSS attack on an affected system. To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker must have valid administrative credentials. This vulnerability is due to improper input validation in the web UI. An authenticated attacker could exploit this vulnerability by injecting malicious code into specific pages of the web UI. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary script code in the context of the web UI or access sensitive, browser-based information. | |||||
| CVE-2024-20514 | 1 Cisco | 2 Evolved Programmable Network Manager, Prime Infrastructure | 2025-07-31 | N/A | N/A |
| A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Evolved Programmable Network Manager (EPNM) and Cisco Prime Infrastructure could allow an authenticated, low-privileged, remote attacker to conduct a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) attack against a user of the interface. This vulnerability exists because the web-based management interface does not properly validate user-supplied input. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by injecting malicious code into a specific page of the interface. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary script code in the context of the affected interface or access sensitive browser-based information. To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker must have at least a low-privileged account on an affected device. | |||||