Total
11736 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2022-3052 | 2 Fedoraproject, Google | 4 Fedora, Chrome, Chrome Os and 1 more | 2025-05-21 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| Heap buffer overflow in Window Manager in Google Chrome on Chrome OS, Lacros prior to 105.0.5195.52 allowed a remote attacker who convinced a user to engage in specific UI interactions to potentially exploit heap corruption via crafted UI interactions. | |||||
| CVE-2022-3043 | 2 Fedoraproject, Google | 3 Fedora, Chrome, Chrome Os | 2025-05-21 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| Heap buffer overflow in Screen Capture in Google Chrome on Chrome OS prior to 105.0.5195.52 allowed a remote attacker who convinced a user to engage in specific UI interactions to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. | |||||
| CVE-2022-3040 | 2 Fedoraproject, Google | 2 Fedora, Chrome | 2025-05-21 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| Use after free in Layout in Google Chrome prior to 105.0.5195.52 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. | |||||
| CVE-2022-3200 | 2 Fedoraproject, Google | 2 Fedora, Chrome | 2025-05-21 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| Heap buffer overflow in Internals in Google Chrome prior to 105.0.5195.125 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) | |||||
| CVE-2025-1876 | 1 Dlink | 2 Dap-1562, Dap-1562 Firmware | 2025-05-21 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in D-Link DAP-1562 1.10. Affected by this issue is the function http_request_parse of the component HTTP Header Handler. The manipulation of the argument Authorization leads to stack-based buffer overflow. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer. | |||||
| CVE-2022-3050 | 2 Fedoraproject, Google | 3 Fedora, Chrome, Chrome Os | 2025-05-21 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| Heap buffer overflow in WebUI in Google Chrome on Chrome OS prior to 105.0.5195.52 allowed a remote attacker who convinced a user to engage in specific UI interactions to potentially exploit heap corruption via crafted UI interactions. | |||||
| CVE-2022-3051 | 2 Fedoraproject, Google | 4 Fedora, Chrome, Chrome Os and 1 more | 2025-05-21 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| Heap buffer overflow in Exosphere in Google Chrome on Chrome OS, Lacros prior to 105.0.5195.52 allowed a remote attacker who convinced a user to engage in specific UI interactions to potentially exploit heap corruption via crafted UI interactions. | |||||
| CVE-2024-42093 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2025-05-21 | N/A | 7.3 HIGH |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/dpaa2: Avoid explicit cpumask var allocation on stack For CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=y kernel, explicit allocation of cpumask variable on stack is not recommended since it can cause potential stack overflow. Instead, kernel code should always use *cpumask_var API(s) to allocate cpumask var in config-neutral way, leaving allocation strategy to CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK. Use *cpumask_var API(s) to address it. | |||||
| CVE-2022-40942 | 1 Tenda | 2 Tx3, Tx3 Firmware | 2025-05-21 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Tenda TX3 US_TX3V1.0br_V16.03.13.11 is vulnerable to stack overflow via compare_parentcontrol_time. | |||||
| CVE-2022-38932 | 1 Toaruos | 1 Toaruos | 2025-05-21 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| readelf in ToaruOS 2.0.1 has a global overflow allowing RCE when parsing a crafted ELF file. | |||||
| CVE-2022-40363 | 1 Flipperzero | 2 Flipper Zero, Flipper Zero Firmware | 2025-05-21 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| A buffer overflow in the component nfc_device_load_mifare_ul_data of Flipper Devices Inc., Flipper Zero before v0.65.2 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted NFC file. | |||||
| CVE-2022-41842 | 1 Xpdfreader | 1 Xpdf | 2025-05-20 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| An issue was discovered in Xpdf 4.04. There is a crash in gfseek(_IO_FILE*, long, int) in goo/gfile.cc. | |||||
| CVE-2022-39173 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolfssl | 2025-05-20 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| In wolfSSL before 5.5.1, malicious clients can cause a buffer overflow during a TLS 1.3 handshake. This occurs when an attacker supposedly resumes a previous TLS session. During the resumption Client Hello a Hello Retry Request must be triggered. Both Client Hellos are required to contain a list of duplicate cipher suites to trigger the buffer overflow. In total, two Client Hellos have to be sent: one in the resumed session, and a second one as a response to a Hello Retry Request message. | |||||
| CVE-2022-41844 | 1 Xpdfreader | 1 Xpdf | 2025-05-20 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| An issue was discovered in Xpdf 4.04. There is a crash in XRef::fetch(int, int, Object*, int) in xpdf/XRef.cc, a different vulnerability than CVE-2018-16369 and CVE-2019-16088. | |||||
| CVE-2019-0988 | 1 Microsoft | 9 Internet Explorer, Windows 10, Windows 7 and 6 more | 2025-05-20 | 7.6 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way the scripting engine handles objects in memory in Microsoft browsers. The vulnerability could corrupt memory in such a way that an attacker could execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could gain the same user rights as the current user. If the current user is logged on with administrative user rights, an attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could take control of an affected system. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. In a web-based attack scenario, an attacker could host a specially crafted website designed to exploit the vulnerability through a Microsoft browser and then convince a user to view the website. An attacker could also embed an ActiveX control marked "safe for initialization" in an application or Microsoft Office document that hosts the browser rendering engine. The attacker could also take advantage of compromised websites and websites that accept or host user-provided content or advertisements. These websites could contain specially crafted content that could exploit the vulnerability. The security update addresses the vulnerability by modifying how the scripting engine handles objects in memory. | |||||
| CVE-2019-1051 | 1 Microsoft | 5 Chakracore, Edge, Windows 10 and 2 more | 2025-05-20 | 7.6 HIGH | 4.2 MEDIUM |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the Chakra scripting engine handles objects in memory in Microsoft Edge (HTML-based). The vulnerability could corrupt memory in such a way that an attacker could execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could gain the same user rights as the current user. If the current user is logged on with administrative user rights, an attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could take control of an affected system. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. In a web-based attack scenario, an attacker could host a specially crafted website that is designed to exploit the vulnerability through Microsoft Edge (HTML-based) and then convince a user to view the website. The attacker could also take advantage of compromised websites and websites that accept or host user-provided content or advertisements. These websites could contain specially crafted content that could exploit the vulnerability. The security update addresses the vulnerability by modifying how the Chakra scripting engine handles objects in memory. | |||||
| CVE-2019-0989 | 1 Microsoft | 5 Chakracore, Edge, Windows 10 and 2 more | 2025-05-20 | 7.6 HIGH | 4.2 MEDIUM |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the Chakra scripting engine handles objects in memory in Microsoft Edge (HTML-based). The vulnerability could corrupt memory in such a way that an attacker could execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could gain the same user rights as the current user. If the current user is logged on with administrative user rights, an attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could take control of an affected system. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. In a web-based attack scenario, an attacker could host a specially crafted website that is designed to exploit the vulnerability through Microsoft Edge (HTML-based) and then convince a user to view the website. The attacker could also take advantage of compromised websites and websites that accept or host user-provided content or advertisements. These websites could contain specially crafted content that could exploit the vulnerability. The security update addresses the vulnerability by modifying how the Chakra scripting engine handles objects in memory. | |||||
| CVE-2019-1002 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Edge, Windows 10, Windows Server 2016 | 2025-05-20 | 7.6 HIGH | 4.2 MEDIUM |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the Chakra scripting engine handles objects in memory in Microsoft Edge (HTML-based). The vulnerability could corrupt memory in such a way that an attacker could execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could gain the same user rights as the current user. If the current user is logged on with administrative user rights, an attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could take control of an affected system. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. In a web-based attack scenario, an attacker could host a specially crafted website that is designed to exploit the vulnerability through Microsoft Edge (HTML-based) and then convince a user to view the website. The attacker could also take advantage of compromised websites and websites that accept or host user-provided content or advertisements. These websites could contain specially crafted content that could exploit the vulnerability. The security update addresses the vulnerability by modifying how the Chakra scripting engine handles objects in memory. | |||||
| CVE-2019-1005 | 1 Microsoft | 9 Internet Explorer, Windows 10, Windows 7 and 6 more | 2025-05-20 | 7.6 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way the scripting engine handles objects in memory in Microsoft browsers. The vulnerability could corrupt memory in such a way that an attacker could execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could gain the same user rights as the current user. If the current user is logged on with administrative user rights, an attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could take control of an affected system. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. In a web-based attack scenario, an attacker could host a specially crafted website designed to exploit the vulnerability through a Microsoft browser and then convince a user to view the website. An attacker could also embed an ActiveX control marked "safe for initialization" in an application or Microsoft Office document that hosts the browser rendering engine. The attacker could also take advantage of compromised websites and websites that accept or host user-provided content or advertisements. These websites could contain specially crafted content that could exploit the vulnerability. The security update addresses the vulnerability by modifying how the scripting engine handles objects in memory. | |||||
| CVE-2019-1038 | 1 Microsoft | 10 Edge, Internet Explorer, Windows 10 and 7 more | 2025-05-20 | 7.6 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that Microsoft browsers access objects in memory. The vulnerability could corrupt memory in a way that could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could gain the same user rights as the current user. If the current user is logged on with administrative user rights, the attacker could take control of an affected system. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. An attacker could host a specially crafted website that is designed to exploit the vulnerability through Microsoft browsers, and then convince a user to view the website. The attacker could also take advantage of compromised websites, or websites that accept or host user-provided content or advertisements, by adding specially crafted content that could exploit the vulnerability. In all cases, however, an attacker would have no way to force users to view the attacker-controlled content. Instead, an attacker would have to convince users to take action, typically via an enticement in email or instant message, or by getting them to open an email attachment. The security update addresses the vulnerability by modifying how Microsoft browsers handle objects in memory. | |||||