Total
7225 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-26153 | 1 Etictelecom | 1 Remote Access Server Firmware | 2025-07-30 | N/A | N/A |
| All versions of ETIC Telecom Remote Access Server (RAS) prior to 4.9.19 are vulnerable to cross-site request forgery (CSRF). An external attacker with no access to the device can force the end user into submitting a "setconf" method request, not requiring any CSRF token, which can lead into denial of service on the device. | |||||
| CVE-2025-7834 | 1 Phpgurukul | 1 Complaint Management System | 2025-07-29 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in PHPGurukul Complaint Management System 2.0. Affected is an unknown function. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. | |||||
| CVE-2024-10481 | 1 Comfy | 1 Comfyui | 2025-07-29 | N/A | N/A |
| A CSRF vulnerability exists in comfyanonymous/comfyui versions up to v0.2.2. This vulnerability allows attackers to host malicious websites that, when visited by authenticated ComfyUI users, can perform arbitrary API requests on behalf of the user. This can be exploited to perform actions such as uploading arbitrary files via the `/upload/image` endpoint. The lack of CSRF protections on API endpoints like `/upload/image`, `/prompt`, and `/history` leaves users vulnerable to unauthorized actions, which could be combined with other vulnerabilities such as stored-XSS to further compromise user sessions. | |||||
| CVE-2024-7035 | 1 Openwebui | 1 Open Webui | 2025-07-29 | N/A | N/A |
| In version v0.3.8 of open-webui/open-webui, sensitive actions such as deleting and resetting are performed using the GET method. This vulnerability allows an attacker to perform Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attacks, where an unaware user can unintentionally perform sensitive actions by simply visiting a malicious site or through top-level navigation. The affected endpoints include /rag/api/v1/reset, /rag/api/v1/reset/db, /api/v1/memories/reset, and /rag/api/v1/reset/uploads. This impacts both the availability and integrity of the application. | |||||
| CVE-2023-2533 | 1 Papercut | 2 Papercut Mf, Papercut Ng | 2025-07-29 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability has been identified in PaperCut NG/MF, which, under specific conditions, could potentially enable an attacker to alter security settings or execute arbitrary code. This could be exploited if the target is an admin with a current login session. Exploiting this would typically involve the possibility of deceiving an admin into clicking a specially crafted malicious link, potentially leading to unauthorized changes. | |||||
| CVE-2025-8104 | 2025-07-27 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM | ||
| The Memory Usage plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.98. This is due to missing nonce validation in the wpmemory_install_plugin() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to silently install one of the several whitelisted plugins via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | |||||
| CVE-2025-8223 | 2025-07-27 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM | ||
| A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in jerryshensjf JPACookieShop ????JPA? up to 24a15c02b4f75042c9f7f615a3fed2ec1cefb999. This affects an unknown part of the file AdminTypeCustController.java. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. This product does not use versioning. This is why information about affected and unaffected releases are unavailable. | |||||
| CVE-2025-8103 | 2025-07-26 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM | ||
| The WPeMatico RSS Feed Fetcher plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.8.7. This is due to missing nonce validation in the handle_feedback_submission() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to deactivate the plugin via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | |||||
| CVE-2024-54172 | 3 Ibm, Linux, Microsoft | 5 Aix, Sterling B2b Integrator, Sterling File Gateway and 2 more | 2025-07-25 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| IBM Sterling B2B Integrator and IBM Sterling File Gateway 6.0.0.0 through 6.1.2.6 and 6.2.0.0 through 6.2.0.4 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. | |||||
| CVE-2025-7835 | 2025-07-25 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM | ||
| The iThoughts Advanced Code Editor plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.10. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'ithoughts_ace_update_options' AJAX action. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update plugin settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | |||||
| CVE-2025-7690 | 2025-07-25 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM | ||
| The Affiliate Plus plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.3.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'affiplus_settings' page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to perform an unauthorized action granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | |||||
| CVE-2021-1257 | 5 Apple, Cisco, Linux and 2 more | 5 Macos, Catalyst Center, Linux Kernel and 2 more | 2025-07-23 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco DNA Center Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack to manipulate an authenticated user into executing malicious actions without their awareness or consent. The vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web-based management interface of an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a web-based management user to follow a specially crafted link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions on the device with the privileges of the authenticated user. These actions include modifying the device configuration, disconnecting the user's session, and executing Command Runner commands. | |||||
| CVE-2025-6054 | 2025-07-23 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM | ||
| The YANewsflash plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'yanewsflash/yanewsflash.php' page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | |||||
| CVE-2025-6214 | 2025-07-23 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM | ||
| The Omnishop plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery on its /users/delete REST route in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.9. The route’s permission_callback only verifies that the requester is logged in, but fails to require any nonce or other proof of intent. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete arbitrary user accounts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | |||||
| CVE-2023-48790 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortindr | 2025-07-22 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| A cross site request forgery vulnerability [CWE-352] in Fortinet FortiNDR version 7.4.0, 7.2.0 through 7.2.1 and 7.1.0 through 7.1.1 and before 7.0.5 may allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to execute unauthorized actions via crafted HTTP GET requests. | |||||
| CVE-2025-7369 | 2025-07-22 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM | ||
| The WP Shortcodes Plugin — Shortcodes Ultimate plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 7.4.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the preview function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary shortcodes via a forged request, granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. In combination with CVE-2025-7354, it leads to Reflected Cross-Site Scripting. | |||||
| CVE-2025-7685 | 2025-07-22 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM | ||
| The Like & Share My Site plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 0.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'lsms_admin' page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | |||||
| CVE-2025-7687 | 2025-07-22 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM | ||
| The Latest Post Accordian Slider plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'lpaccordian' page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | |||||
| CVE-2025-20321 | 1 Splunk | 2 Splunk, Splunk Cloud Platform | 2025-07-21 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| In Splunk Enterprise versions below 9.4.3, 9.3.5, 9.2.7 and 9.1.10, and Splunk Cloud Platform versions below 9.3.2411.104, 9.3.2408.114, and 9.2.2406.119, an unauthenticated attacker can send a specially-crafted SPL search that could change the membership state in a Splunk Search Head Cluster (SHC) through a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF), potentially leading to the removal of the captain or a member of the SHC.<br><br>The vulnerability requires the attacker to phish the administrator-level victim by tricking them into initiating a request within their browser. The attacker should not be able to exploit the vulnerability at will. | |||||
| CVE-2025-20322 | 1 Splunk | 2 Splunk, Splunk Cloud Platform | 2025-07-21 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| In Splunk Enterprise versions below 9.4.3, 9.3.5, 9.2.7, and 9.1.10, and Splunk Cloud Platform versions below 9.3.2411.104, 9.3.2408.113, and 9.2.2406.119, an unauthenticated attacker could send a specially-crafted SPL search command that could trigger a rolling restart in the Search Head Cluster through a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF), potentially leading to a denial of service (DoS).<br><br>The vulnerability requires the attacker to phish the administrator-level victim by tricking them into initiating a request within their browser. The attacker should not be able to exploit the vulnerability at will.<br><br>See [How rolling restart works](https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/Splunk/9.4.2/DistSearch/RestartSHC) for more information. | |||||