Total
7225 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2017-7556 | 1 Hawt | 1 Hawtio | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Hawtio versions up to and including 1.5.3 are vulnerable to CSRF vulnerability allowing remote attackers to trick the user to visit their website containing a malicious script which can be submitted to hawtio server on behalf of the user. | |||||
| CVE-2017-7917 | 1 Moxa | 12 Oncell 5004-hspa, Oncell 5004-hspa Firmware, Oncell 5104-hsdpa and 9 more | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| A Cross-Site Request Forgery issue was discovered in Moxa OnCell G3110-HSPA Version 1.3 build 15082117 and previous versions, OnCell G3110-HSDPA Version 1.2 Build 09123015 and previous versions, OnCell G3150-HSDPA Version 1.4 Build 11051315 and previous versions, OnCell 5104-HSDPA, OnCell 5104-HSPA, and OnCell 5004-HSPA. The application does not sufficiently verify if a request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request, which could allow an attacker to modify the configuration of the device. | |||||
| CVE-2017-6756 | 1 Cisco | 1 Prime Collaboration Provisioning | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| A vulnerability in the Web UI Application of the Cisco Prime Collaboration Provisioning Tool through 12.2 could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to execute unwanted actions. The vulnerability is due to a lack of defense against cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by forcing the user's browser to perform any action authorized for that user. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvc90280. | |||||
| CVE-2017-7557 | 1 Powerdns | 1 Dnsdist | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| dnsdist version 1.1.0 is vulnerable to a flaw in authentication mechanism for REST API potentially allowing CSRF attack. | |||||
| CVE-2017-7926 | 1 Osisoft | 1 Pi Web Api | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| A Cross-Site Request Forgery issue was discovered in OSIsoft PI Web API versions prior to 2017 (1.9.0). The vulnerability allows cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks to occur when an otherwise-unauthorized cross-site request is sent from a browser the server has previously authenticated. | |||||
| CVE-2017-5263 | 1 Cambiumnetworks | 10 Cnpilot E400, Cnpilot E400 Firmware, Cnpilot E410 and 7 more | 2019-10-09 | 5.4 MEDIUM | 8.0 HIGH |
| Versions 4.3.2-R4 and prior of Cambium Networks cnPilot firmware lack CSRF controls that can mitigate the effects of CSRF attacks, which are most typically implemented as randomized per-session tokens associated with any web application function, especially destructive ones. | |||||
| CVE-2017-6042 | 1 Sierra Wireless | 4 Airlink Raven Xe, Airlink Raven Xe Firmware, Airlink Raven Xt and 1 more | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| A Cross-Site Request Forgery issue was discovered in Sierra Wireless AirLink Raven XE, all versions prior to 4.0.14, and AirLink Raven XT, all versions prior to 4.0.11. Affected devices do not verify if a request was intentionally sent by the logged-in user, which may allow an attacker to trick a client into making an unintentional request to the web server that will be treated as an authentic request. | |||||
| CVE-2017-6038 | 1 Belden Hirschmann | 2 Gecko Lite Managed Switch, Gecko Lite Managed Switch Firmware | 2019-10-09 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 7.1 HIGH |
| A Cross-Site Request Forgery issue was discovered in Belden Hirschmann GECKO Lite Managed switch, Version 2.0.00 and prior versions. The web application does not sufficiently verify that requests were provided by the user who submitted the request. | |||||
| CVE-2017-5244 | 1 Rapid7 | 1 Metasploit | 2019-10-09 | 3.5 LOW | 3.5 LOW |
| Routes used to stop running Metasploit tasks (either particular ones or all tasks) allowed GET requests. Only POST requests should have been allowed, as the stop/stop_all routes change the state of the service. This could have allowed an attacker to stop currently-running Metasploit tasks by getting an authenticated user to execute JavaScript. As of Metasploit 4.14.0 (Update 2017061301), the routes for stopping tasks only allow POST requests, which validate the presence of a secret token to prevent CSRF attacks. | |||||
| CVE-2017-3187 | 1 Dotcms | 1 Dotcms | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| The dotCMS administration panel, versions 3.7.1 and earlier, are vulnerable to cross-site request forgery. The dotCMS administrator panel contains a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability. An attacker can perform actions with the same permissions as a victim user, provided the victim has an active session and is induced to trigger the malicious request. An unauthenticated remote attacker may perform actions with the dotCMS administrator panel with the same permissions of a victim user or execute arbitrary system commands with the permissions of the user running the dotCMS application. | |||||
| CVE-2017-2613 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Jenkins | 2019-10-09 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| jenkins before versions 2.44, 2.32.2 is vulnerable to a user creation CSRF using GET by admins. While this user record was only retained until restart in most cases, administrators' web browsers could be manipulated to create a large number of user records (SECURITY-406). | |||||
| CVE-2017-14011 | 1 Prominent | 2 Multiflex M10a Controller, Multiflex M10a Controller Firmware | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| A Cross-Site Request Forgery issue was discovered in ProMinent MultiFLEX M10a Controller web interface. The application does not sufficiently verify requests, making it susceptible to cross-site request forgery. This may allow an attacker to execute unauthorized code, resulting in changes to the configuration of the device. | |||||
| CVE-2017-12253 | 1 Cisco | 1 Unified Intelligence Center | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| A vulnerability in the Cisco Unified Intelligence Center could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to execute unwanted actions. The vulnerability is due to a lack of cross-site request forgery (CSRF) protection. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by tricking the user of a web application into executing an adverse action. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCve76872. | |||||
| CVE-2017-0933 | 1 Ubnt | 1 Edgeos | 2019-10-09 | 8.5 HIGH | 8.0 HIGH |
| Ubiquiti Networks EdgeOS version 1.9.1 and prior suffer from a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability. An attacker with access to an operator (read-only) account could lure an admin (root) user to access the attacker-controlled page, allowing the attacker to gain admin privileges in the system. | |||||
| CVE-2016-9127 | 1 Revive-adserver | 1 Revive Adserver | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Revive Adserver before 3.2.3 suffers from Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF). The password recovery form in Revive Adserver is vulnerable to CSRF attacks. This vulnerability could be exploited to send a large number of password recovery emails to the registered users, especially in conjunction with a bug that caused recovery emails to be sent to all the users at once. Both issues have been fixed. | |||||
| CVE-2016-6557 | 1 Asus | 14 Ea-n66, Ea-n66 Firmware, Rp-ac52 and 11 more | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| In ASUS RP-AC52 access points with firmware version 1.0.1.1s and possibly earlier, the web interface, the web interface does not sufficiently verify whether a valid request was intentionally provided by the user. An attacker can perform actions with the same permissions as a victim user, provided the victim has an active session and is induced to trigger the malicious request. | |||||
| CVE-2016-1265 | 1 Juniper | 1 Junos Space | 2019-10-09 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| A remote unauthenticated network based attacker with access to Junos Space may execute arbitrary code on Junos Space or gain access to devices managed by Junos Space using cross site request forgery (CSRF), default authentication credentials, information leak and command injection attack vectors. All versions of Juniper Networks Junos Space prior to 15.1R3 are affected. | |||||
| CVE-2016-1261 | 1 Juniper | 1 Junos | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| J-Web does not validate certain input that may lead to cross-site request forgery (CSRF) issues or cause a denial of J-Web service (DoS). | |||||
| CVE-2016-10529 | 1 Droppy Project | 1 Droppy | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Droppy versions <3.5.0 does not perform any verification for cross-domain websocket requests. An attacker is able to make a specially crafted page that can send requests as the context of the currently logged in user. For example this means the malicious user could add a new admin account under his control and delete others. | |||||
| CVE-2016-10522 | 1 Rails Admin Project | 1 Rails Admin | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| rails_admin ruby gem <v1.1.1 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks. Non-GET methods were not validating CSRF tokens and, as a result, an attacker could hypothetically gain access to the application administrative endpoints exposed by the gem. | |||||