Total
7225 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2020-23522 | 1 Pixelimity | 1 Pixelimity | 2021-02-09 | 6.0 MEDIUM | 6.8 MEDIUM |
| Pixelimity 1.0 has cross-site request forgery via the admin/setting.php data [Password] parameter. | |||||
| CVE-2021-20652 | 1 Name Directory Project | 1 Name Directory | 2021-02-08 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Name Directory 1.17.4 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via unspecified vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2020-24271 | 1 Easycms | 1 Easycms | 2021-02-05 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| A CSRF vulnerability was discovered in EasyCMS v1.6 that can add an admin account through index.php?s=/admin/rbacuser/insert/navTabId/rbacuser/callbackType/closeCurrent, then post username=***&password=***. | |||||
| CVE-2021-25765 | 1 Jetbrains | 1 Youtrack | 2021-02-04 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| In JetBrains YouTrack before 2020.4.4701, CSRF via attachment upload was possible. | |||||
| CVE-2020-4827 | 1 Ibm | 1 Api Connect | 2021-02-04 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| IBM API Connect 10.0.0.0 through 10.0.1.0 and 2018.4.1.0 through 2018.4.1.13 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 189841. | |||||
| CVE-2020-4826 | 1 Ibm | 1 Api Connect | 2021-02-04 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| IBM API Connect 10.0.0.0 through 10.0.1.0 and 2018.4.1.0 through 2018.4.1.13 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 189840. | |||||
| CVE-2020-29004 | 1 Mediawiki | 1 Mediawiki | 2021-02-03 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| The API in the Push extension for MediaWiki through 1.35 did not require an edit token in ApiPushBase.php and therefore facilitated a CSRF attack. | |||||
| CVE-2020-35687 | 1 Php-fusion | 1 Phpfusion | 2021-02-02 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| PHPFusion version 9.03.90 is vulnerable to CSRF attack which leads to deletion of all shoutbox messages by the attacker on behalf of the logged in victim. | |||||
| CVE-2020-35217 | 1 Eclipse | 1 Vert.x-web | 2021-02-02 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Vert.x-Web framework v4.0 milestone 1-4 does not perform a correct CSRF verification. Instead of comparing the CSRF token in the request with the CSRF token in the cookie, it compares the CSRF token in the cookie against a CSRF token that is stored in the session. An attacker does not even need to provide a CSRF token in the request because the framework does not consider it. The cookies are automatically sent by the browser and the verification will always succeed, leading to a successful CSRF attack. | |||||
| CVE-2021-20621 | 1 Aterm | 4 Wg2600hp, Wg2600hp2, Wg2600hp2 Firmware and 1 more | 2021-02-01 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Aterm WG2600HP firmware Ver1.0.2 and earlier, and Aterm WG2600HP2 firmware Ver1.0.2 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via unspecified vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2020-23342 | 1 Anchorcms | 1 Anchor Cms | 2021-02-01 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| A CSRF vulnerability exists in Anchor CMS 0.12.7 anchor/views/users/edit.php that can change the Delete admin users. | |||||
| CVE-2020-12511 | 1 Pepperl-fuchs | 24 Io-link Master 4-eip, Io-link Master 4-eip Firmware, Io-link Master 4-pnio and 21 more | 2021-01-27 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Pepperl+Fuchs Comtrol IO-Link Master in Version 1.5.48 and below is prone to a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in the web interface. | |||||
| CVE-2020-28452 | 1 Softwaremill | 1 Akka-http-session | 2021-01-27 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| This affects the package com.softwaremill.akka-http-session:core_2.12 from 0 and before 0.6.1; all versions of package com.softwaremill.akka-http-session:core_2.11; the package com.softwaremill.akka-http-session:core_2.13 from 0 and before 0.6.1. CSRF protection can be bypassed by forging a request that contains the same value for both the X-XSRF-TOKEN header and the XSRF-TOKEN cookie value, as the check in randomTokenCsrfProtection only checks that the two values are equal and non-empty. | |||||
| CVE-2017-8874 | 1 Acquia | 1 Mautic | 2021-01-25 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Mautic 1.4.1 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests that (1) delete email campaigns or (2) delete contacts. | |||||
| CVE-2020-6776 | 1 Bosch | 4 Praesensa, Praesensa Firmware, Praesideo and 1 more | 2021-01-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Bosch PRAESIDEO until and including version 4.41 and Bosch PRAESENSA until and including version 1.10 allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to trigger actions on an affected system on behalf of another user (Cross-Site Request Forgery). This requires the victim to be tricked into clicking a malicious link or submitting a malicious form. A successful exploit allows the attacker to perform arbitrary actions with the privileges of the victim, e.g. creating and modifying user accounts, changing system configuration settings and cause DoS conditions. Note: For Bosch PRAESIDEO 4.31 and newer and Bosch PRAESENSA in all versions, the confidentiality impact is considered low because user credentials are not shown in the web interface. | |||||
| CVE-2020-36191 | 1 Jupyter | 1 Jupyterhub | 2021-01-19 | 3.5 LOW | 4.5 MEDIUM |
| JupyterHub 1.1.0 allows CSRF in the admin panel via a request that lacks an _xsrf field, as demonstrated by a /hub/api/user request (to add or remove a user account). | |||||
| CVE-2021-21241 | 1 Flask-security-too Project | 1 Flask-security-too | 2021-01-19 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 7.4 HIGH |
| The Python "Flask-Security-Too" package is used for adding security features to your Flask application. It is an is a independently maintained version of Flask-Security based on the 3.0.0 version of Flask-Security. In Flask-Security-Too from version 3.3.0 and before version 3.4.5, the /login and /change endpoints can return the authenticated user's authentication token in response to a GET request. Since GET requests aren't protected with a CSRF token, this could lead to a malicious 3rd party site acquiring the authentication token. Version 3.4.5 and version 4.0.0 are patched. As a workaround, if you aren't using authentication tokens - you can set the SECURITY_TOKEN_MAX_AGE to "0" (seconds) which should make the token unusable. | |||||
| CVE-2020-35950 | 1 Xcloner | 1 Xcloner | 2021-01-13 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in the XCloner Backup and Restore plugin before 4.2.153 for WordPress. It allows CSRF (via almost any endpoint). | |||||
| CVE-2020-25950 | 1 Totalonlinesolutions | 1 Advanced Webhost Billing System | 2021-01-12 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| Advanced Webhost Billing System 3.7.0 is affected by Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attacks that can delete a contact from the My Additional Contact page. | |||||
| CVE-2020-36174 | 1 Ninjaforms | 1 Ninja Forms | 2021-01-08 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| The Ninja Forms plugin before 3.4.27.1 for WordPress allows CSRF via services integration. | |||||