Total
358 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2023-33982 | 1 Briarproject | 1 Briar | 2025-01-16 | N/A | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| Bramble Handshake Protocol (BHP) in Briar before 1.5.3 is not forward secure: eavesdroppers can decrypt network traffic between two accounts if they later compromise both accounts. NOTE: the eavesdropping is typically impractical because BHP runs over an encrypted session that uses the Tor hidden service protocol. | |||||
| CVE-2023-29549 | 1 Mozilla | 2 Firefox, Focus | 2025-01-10 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Under certain circumstances, a call to the <code>bind</code> function may have resulted in the incorrect realm. This may have created a vulnerability relating to JavaScript-implemented sandboxes such as SES. This vulnerability affects Firefox for Android < 112, Firefox < 112, and Focus for Android < 112. | |||||
| CVE-2023-33283 | 1 Marvalglobal | 1 Msm | 2025-01-07 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| Marval MSM through 14.19.0.12476 uses a static encryption key for secrets. An attacker that gains access to encrypted secrets can decrypt them by using this key. | |||||
| CVE-2020-3549 | 1 Cisco | 2 Firepower Threat Defense, Secure Firewall Management Center | 2024-11-26 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| A vulnerability in the sftunnel functionality of Cisco Firepower Management Center (FMC) Software and Cisco Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to obtain the device registration hash. The vulnerability is due to insufficient sftunnel negotiation protection during initial device registration. An attacker in a man-in-the-middle position could exploit this vulnerability by intercepting a specific flow of the sftunnel communication between an FMC device and an FTD device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to decrypt and modify the sftunnel communication between FMC and FTD devices, allowing the attacker to modify configuration data sent from an FMC device to an FTD device or alert data sent from an FTD device to an FMC device. | |||||
| CVE-2022-48193 | 1 Softing | 1 Smartlink Sw-ht | 2024-10-28 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| Weak ciphers in Softing smartLink SW-HT before 1.30 are enabled during secure communication (SSL). | |||||
| CVE-2013-2566 | 4 Canonical, Fujitsu, Mozilla and 1 more | 24 Ubuntu Linux, M10-1, M10-1 Firmware and 21 more | 2024-10-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| The RC4 algorithm, as used in the TLS protocol and SSL protocol, has many single-byte biases, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct plaintext-recovery attacks via statistical analysis of ciphertext in a large number of sessions that use the same plaintext. | |||||
| CVE-2013-0764 | 4 Canonical, Mozilla, Opensuse and 1 more | 9 Ubuntu Linux, Firefox, Seamonkey and 6 more | 2024-10-21 | 9.3 HIGH | N/A |
| The nsSOCKSSocketInfo::ConnectToProxy function in Mozilla Firefox before 18.0, Firefox ESR 17.x before 17.0.2, Thunderbird before 17.0.2, Thunderbird ESR 17.x before 17.0.2, and SeaMonkey before 2.15 does not ensure thread safety for SSL sessions, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted data, as demonstrated by e-mail message data. | |||||
| CVE-2023-27987 | 1 Apache | 1 Linkis | 2024-10-17 | N/A | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| In Apache Linkis <=1.3.1, due to the default token generated by Linkis Gateway deployment being too simple, it is easy for attackers to obtain the default token for the attack. Generation rules should add random values. We recommend users upgrade the version of Linkis to version 1.3.2 And modify the default token value. You can refer to Token authorization[1] https://linkis.apache.org/docs/latest/auth/token https://linkis.apache.org/docs/latest/auth/token | |||||
| CVE-2024-45273 | 2 Helmholz, Mbconnectline | 27 Myrex24 V2 Virtual Server, Rex 100, Rex 100 Firmware and 24 more | 2024-10-17 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| An unauthenticated local attacker can decrypt the devices config file and therefore compromise the device due to a weak implementation of the encryption used. | |||||
| CVE-2024-45394 | 1 Authenticator | 1 Authenticator | 2024-10-09 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| Authenticator is a browser extension that generates two-step verification codes. In versions 7.0.0 and below, encryption keys for user data were stored encrypted at-rest using only AES-256 and the EVP_BytesToKey KDF. Therefore, attackers with a copy of a user's data are able to brute-force the user's encryption key. Users on version 8.0.0 and above are automatically migrated away from the weak encoding on first login. Users should destroy encrypted backups made with versions prior to 8.0.0. | |||||
| CVE-2024-47182 | 1 Amirraminfar | 1 Dozzle | 2024-10-04 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| Dozzle is a realtime log viewer for docker containers. Before version 8.5.3, the app uses sha-256 as the hash for passwords, which leaves users susceptible to rainbow table attacks. The app switches to bcrypt, a more appropriate hash for passwords, in version 8.5.3. | |||||
| CVE-2024-8455 | 1 Planet | 6 Gs-4210-24p2s, Gs-4210-24p2s Firmware, Gs-4210-24pl4c and 3 more | 2024-10-04 | N/A | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| The swctrl service is used to detect and remotely manage PLANET Technology devices. For certain switch models, the authentication tokens used during communication with this service are encoded user passwords. Due to insufficient strength, unauthorized remote attackers who intercept the packets can directly crack them to obtain plaintext passwords. | |||||
| CVE-2023-36539 | 1 Zoom | 14 Meetings, Poly Ccx 600, Poly Ccx 600 Firmware and 11 more | 2024-09-18 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| Exposure of information intended to be encrypted by some Zoom clients may lead to disclosure of sensitive information. | |||||
| CVE-2021-20406 | 2 Ibm, Linux | 2 Security Verify Information Queue, Linux Kernel | 2024-09-16 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 4.9 MEDIUM |
| IBM Security Verify Information Queue 1.0.6 and 1.0.7 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 196184. | |||||
| CVE-2021-38121 | 1 Microfocus | 1 Netiq Advanced Authentication | 2024-09-13 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| Insufficient or weak TLS protocol version identified in Advance authentication client server communication when specific service is accessed between devices. This issue affects NetIQ Advance Authentication versions before 6.3.5.1 | |||||
| CVE-2024-22894 | 2 Alpha-innotec, Novelan | 4 Heat Pumps, Heat Pumps Firmware, Heat Pumps and 1 more | 2024-08-29 | N/A | 6.8 MEDIUM |
| An issue fixed in AIT-Deutschland Alpha Innotec Heatpumps V2.88.3 or later, V3.89.0 or later, V4.81.3 or later and Novelan Heatpumps V2.88.3 or later, V3.89.0 or later, V4.81.3 or later, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via the password component in the shadow file. | |||||
| CVE-2024-42163 | 1 Fiware | 1 Keyrock | 2024-08-29 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH |
| Insufficiently random values for generating password reset token in FIWARE Keyrock <= 8.4 allow attackers to take over the account of any user by predicting the token for the password reset link. | |||||
| CVE-2024-41681 | 1 Siemens | 1 Location Intelligence | 2024-08-14 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| A vulnerability has been identified in Location Intelligence family (All versions < V4.4). The web server of affected products is configured to support weak ciphers by default. This could allow an unauthenticated attacker in an on-path position to to read and modify any data passed over the connection between legitimate clients and the affected device. | |||||
| CVE-2024-38867 | 2024-08-13 | N/A | N/A | ||
| A vulnerability has been identified in SIPROTEC 5 6MD84 (CP300) (All versions < V9.64), SIPROTEC 5 6MD85 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 6MD85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.64), SIPROTEC 5 6MD86 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 6MD86 (CP300) (All versions < V9.64), SIPROTEC 5 6MD89 (CP300) (All versions < V9.64), SIPROTEC 5 6MU85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.64), SIPROTEC 5 7KE85 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7KE85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.64), SIPROTEC 5 7SA82 (CP100) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SA82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.65), SIPROTEC 5 7SA84 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SA86 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SA86 (CP300) (All versions < V9.65), SIPROTEC 5 7SA87 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SA87 (CP300) (All versions < V9.65), SIPROTEC 5 7SD82 (CP100) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SD82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.65), SIPROTEC 5 7SD84 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SD86 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SD86 (CP300) (All versions < V9.65), SIPROTEC 5 7SD87 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SD87 (CP300) (All versions < V9.65), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ81 (CP100) (All versions < V8.89), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ81 (CP150) (All versions < V9.65), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ82 (CP100) (All versions < V8.89), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.65), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ85 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.65), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ86 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ86 (CP300) (All versions < V9.65), SIPROTEC 5 7SK82 (CP100) (All versions < V8.89), SIPROTEC 5 7SK82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.65), SIPROTEC 5 7SK85 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SK85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.65), SIPROTEC 5 7SL82 (CP100) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SL82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.65), SIPROTEC 5 7SL86 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SL86 (CP300) (All versions < V9.65), SIPROTEC 5 7SL87 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SL87 (CP300) (All versions < V9.65), SIPROTEC 5 7SS85 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SS85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.64), SIPROTEC 5 7ST85 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7ST85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.64), SIPROTEC 5 7ST86 (CP300) (All versions < V9.64), SIPROTEC 5 7SX82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.65), SIPROTEC 5 7SX85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.65), SIPROTEC 5 7UM85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.64), SIPROTEC 5 7UT82 (CP100) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7UT82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.65), SIPROTEC 5 7UT85 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7UT85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.65), SIPROTEC 5 7UT86 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7UT86 (CP300) (All versions < V9.65), SIPROTEC 5 7UT87 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7UT87 (CP300) (All versions < V9.65), SIPROTEC 5 7VE85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.64), SIPROTEC 5 7VK87 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7VK87 (CP300) (All versions < V9.65), SIPROTEC 5 7VU85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.64), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BA-2EL (Rev.1) (All versions < V9.62 installed on CP150 and CP300 devices), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BA-2EL (Rev.1) (All versions installed on CP200 devices), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BA-2EL (Rev.1) (All versions < V8.89 installed on CP100 devices), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BB-2FO (Rev. 1) (All versions installed on CP200 devices), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BB-2FO (Rev. 1) (All versions < V9.62 installed on CP150 and CP300 devices), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BB-2FO (Rev. 1) (All versions < V8.89 installed on CP100 devices), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BD-2FO (All versions < V9.62), SIPROTEC 5 Compact 7SX800 (CP050) (All versions < V9.64). The affected devices are supporting weak ciphers on several ports (443/tcp for web, 4443/tcp for DIGSI 5 and configurable port for syslog over TLS). This could allow an unauthorized attacker in a man-in-the-middle position to decrypt any data passed over to and from those ports. | |||||
| CVE-2024-5800 | 2024-08-12 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Diffie-Hellman groups with insufficient strength are used in the SSL/TLS stack of B&R Automation Runtime versions before 6.0.2, allowing a network attacker to decrypt the SSL/TLS communication. | |||||