Vulnerabilities (CVE)

Filtered by CWE-326
Total 358 CVE
CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v2 CVSS v3
CVE-2020-9128 1 Huawei 1 Fusioncompute 2020-11-20 2.1 LOW 4.4 MEDIUM
FusionCompute versions 8.0.0 have an insecure encryption algorithm vulnerability. Attackers with high permissions can exploit this vulnerability to cause information leak.
CVE-2020-5938 1 F5 14 Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager, Big-ip Advanced Web Application Firewall and 11 more 2020-11-09 4.0 MEDIUM 6.5 MEDIUM
On BIG-IP 13.1.0-13.1.3.4, 12.1.0-12.1.5.2, and 11.6.1-11.6.5.2, when negotiating IPSec tunnels with configured, authenticated peers, the peer may negotiate a different key length than the BIG-IP configuration would otherwise allow.
CVE-2016-7798 2 Debian, Ruby-lang 2 Debian Linux, Openssl 2020-11-05 5.0 MEDIUM 7.5 HIGH
The openssl gem for Ruby uses the same initialization vector (IV) in GCM Mode (aes-*-gcm) when the IV is set before the key, which makes it easier for context-dependent attackers to bypass the encryption protection mechanism.
CVE-2016-3019 1 Ibm 1 Security Access Manager 9.0 Firmware 2020-10-27 4.0 MEDIUM 6.5 MEDIUM
IBM Security Access Manager for Web 9.0.0 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 114462.
CVE-2016-5919 1 Ibm 6 Security Access Manager 9.0 Firmware, Security Access Manager For Mobile, Security Access Manager For Mobile Appliance and 3 more 2020-10-27 5.0 MEDIUM 7.5 HIGH
IBM Security Access Manager for Web 7.0.0, 8.0.0, and 9.0.0 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. IBM Reference #: 1996868.
CVE-2020-5917 1 F5 12 Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager, Big-ip Analytics and 9 more 2020-09-02 4.3 MEDIUM 5.9 MEDIUM
In BIG-IP versions 15.1.0-15.1.0.4, 15.0.0-15.0.1.3, 14.1.0-14.1.2.3, 13.1.0-13.1.3.4, 12.1.0-12.1.5.1, and 11.6.1-11.6.5.2 and BIG-IQ versions 5.2.0-7.0.0, the host OpenSSH servers utilize keys of less than 2048 bits which are no longer considered secure.
CVE-2020-10125 1 Ncr 2 Aptra Xfs, Selfserv Atm 2020-08-27 4.6 MEDIUM 7.6 HIGH
NCR SelfServ ATMs running APTRA XFS 04.02.01 and 05.01.00 implement 512-bit RSA certificates to validate bunch note acceptor (BNA) software updates, which can be broken by an attacker with physical access in a sufficiently short period of time, thereby enabling the attacker to sign arbitrary files and CAB archives used to update BNA software, as well as bypass application whitelisting, resulting in the ability to execute arbitrary code.
CVE-2019-17598 1 Lightbend 1 Play Framework 2020-08-24 4.3 MEDIUM 7.5 HIGH
An issue was discovered in Lightbend Play Framework 2.5.x through 2.6.23. When configured to make requests using an authenticated HTTP proxy, play-ws may sometimes, typically under high load, when connecting to a target host using https, expose the proxy credentials to the target host.
CVE-2019-10855 1 Computrols 1 Computrols Building Automation Software 2020-08-24 5.0 MEDIUM 7.5 HIGH
Computrols CBAS 18.0.0 mishandles password hashes. The approach is MD5 with a pw prefix, e.g., if the password is admin, it will calculate the MD5 hash of pwadmin and store it in a MySQL database.
CVE-2019-7648 1 Hotels Server Project 1 Hotels Server 2020-08-24 5.0 MEDIUM 7.5 HIGH
controller/fetchpwd.php and controller/doAction.php in Hotels_Server through 2018-11-05 rely on base64 in an attempt to protect password storage.
CVE-2019-6972 1 Tp-link 2 Tl-wr1043nd, Tl-wr1043nd Firmware 2020-08-24 5.0 MEDIUM 7.5 HIGH
An issue was discovered on TP-Link TL-WR1043ND V2 devices. The credentials can be easily decoded and cracked by brute-force, WordList, or Rainbow Table attacks. Specifically, credentials in the "Authorization" cookie are encoded with URL encoding and base64, leading to easy decoding. Also, the username is cleartext, and the password is hashed with the MD5 algorithm (after decoding of the URL encoded string with base64).
CVE-2019-10907 1 Airsonic Project 1 Airsonic 2020-08-24 5.0 MEDIUM 9.8 CRITICAL
Airsonic 10.2.1 uses Spring's default remember-me mechanism based on MD5, with a fixed key of airsonic in GlobalSecurityConfig.java. An attacker able to capture cookies might be able to trivially bruteforce offline the passwords of associated users.
CVE-2018-15796 1 Pivotal Software 1 Bits Service 2020-08-24 5.5 MEDIUM 8.1 HIGH
Cloud Foundry Bits Service Release, versions prior to 2.14.0, uses an insecure hashing algorithm to sign URLs. A remote malicious user may obtain a signed URL and extract the signing key, allowing them complete read and write access to the the Bits Service storage.
CVE-2019-16649 1 Supermicro 672 A1sa2-2750f, A1sa2-2750f Firmware, A1sai-2550f and 669 more 2020-08-24 5.0 MEDIUM 10.0 CRITICAL
On Supermicro H11, H12, M11, X9, X10, and X11 products, a combination of encryption and authentication problems in the virtual media service allows capture of BMC credentials and data transferred over virtual media devices. Attackers can use captured credentials to connect virtual USB devices to the server managed by the BMC.
CVE-2018-1466 1 Ibm 14 San Volume Controller, San Volume Controller Firmware, Spectrum Virtualize and 11 more 2020-08-19 3.5 LOW 5.3 MEDIUM
IBM SAN Volume Controller, IBM Storwize, IBM Spectrum Virtualize and IBM FlashSystem products (6.1, 6.2, 6.3, 6.4, 7.1, 7.2, 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, 7.6, 7.6.1, 7.7, 7.7.1, 7.8, 7.8.1, 8.1, and 8.1.1) use weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 140397.
CVE-2018-0448 1 Cisco 1 Digital Network Architecture Center 2020-08-12 7.5 HIGH 9.8 CRITICAL
A vulnerability in the identity management service of Cisco Digital Network Architecture (DNA) Center could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass authentication and take complete control of identity management functions. The vulnerability is due to insufficient security restrictions for critical management functions. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a valid identity management request to the affected system. An exploit could allow the attacker to view and make unauthorized modifications to existing system users as well as create new users.
CVE-2014-1491 7 Canonical, Debian, Fedoraproject and 4 more 14 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Fedora and 11 more 2020-07-31 4.3 MEDIUM N/A
Mozilla Network Security Services (NSS) before 3.15.4, as used in Mozilla Firefox before 27.0, Firefox ESR 24.x before 24.3, Thunderbird before 24.3, SeaMonkey before 2.24, and other products, does not properly restrict public values in Diffie-Hellman key exchanges, which makes it easier for remote attackers to bypass cryptographic protection mechanisms in ticket handling by leveraging use of a certain value.
CVE-2018-6594 3 Canonical, Debian, Dlitz 3 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Pycrypto 2020-07-31 5.0 MEDIUM 7.5 HIGH
lib/Crypto/PublicKey/ElGamal.py in PyCrypto through 2.6.1 generates weak ElGamal key parameters, which allows attackers to obtain sensitive information by reading ciphertext data (i.e., it does not have semantic security in face of a ciphertext-only attack). The Decisional Diffie-Hellman (DDH) assumption does not hold for PyCrypto's ElGamal implementation.
CVE-2020-5763 1 Grandstream 12 Ht801, Ht801 Firmware, Ht802 and 9 more 2020-07-31 9.0 HIGH 8.8 HIGH
Grandstream HT800 series firmware version 1.0.17.5 and below contain a backdoor in the SSH service. An authenticated remote attacker can obtain a root shell by correctly answering a challenge prompt.
CVE-2020-1982 1 Paloaltonetworks 1 Pan-os 2020-07-14 5.8 MEDIUM 4.8 MEDIUM
Certain communication between PAN-OS and cloud-delivered services inadvertently use TLS 1.0, which is known to be a cryptographically weak protocol. These cloud services include Cortex Data Lake, the Customer Support Portal, and the Prisma Access infrastructure. Conditions required for exploitation of known TLS 1.0 weaknesses do not exist for the communication between PAN-OS and cloud-delivered services. We do not believe that any communication is impacted as a result of known attacks against TLS 1.0. This issue impacts: All versions of PAN-OS 8.0; PAN-OS 8.1 versions earlier than PAN-OS 8.1.14; PAN-OS 9.0 versions earlier than PAN-OS 9.0.9; PAN-OS 9.1 versions earlier than PAN-OS 9.1.3. PAN-OS 7.1 is not impacted by this issue.