Total
3293 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-24894 | 2025-02-18 | N/A | N/A | ||
| SPID.AspNetCore.Authentication is an AspNetCore Remote Authenticator for SPID. Authentication using Spid and CIE is based on the SAML2 standard which provides two entities: Identity Provider (IDP): the system that authenticates users and provides identity information (SAML affirmation) to the Service Provider, in essence, is responsible for the management of the credentials and identity of users; Service Provider (SP): the system that provides a service to the user and relies on the Identity Provider to authenticate the user, receives SAML assertions from the IdP to grant access to resources. The validation logic of the signature is central as it ensures that you cannot create a SAML response with arbitrary assertions and then impersonate other users. There is no guarantee that the first signature refers to the root object, it follows that if an attacker injects an item signed as the first element, all other signatures will not be verified. The only requirement is to have an XML element legitimately signed by the IdP, a condition that is easily met using the IdP's public metadata. An attacker could create an arbitrary SAML response that would be accepted by SPs using vulnerable SDKs, allowing him to impersonate any Spid and/or CIE user. This vulnerability has been addressed in version 3.4.0 and all users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2023-27091 | 1 Teacms Project | 1 Teacms | 2025-02-18 | N/A | 7.2 HIGH |
| An unauthorized access issue found in XiaoBingby TeaCMS 2.3.3 allows attackers to escalate privileges via the id and keywords parameter(s). | |||||
| CVE-2021-28235 | 1 Etcd | 1 Etcd | 2025-02-18 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Authentication vulnerability found in Etcd-io v.3.4.10 allows remote attackers to escalate privileges via the debug function. | |||||
| CVE-2023-28503 | 2 Linux, Rocketsoftware | 3 Linux Kernel, Unidata, Universe | 2025-02-18 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Rocket Software UniData versions prior to 8.2.4 build 3003 and UniVerse versions prior to 11.3.5 build 1001 or 12.2.1 build 2002 suffer from an authentication bypass vulnerability, where a special username with a deterministic password can be leveraged to bypass authentication checks and execute OS commands as the root user. | |||||
| CVE-2023-28862 | 1 Lemonldap-ng | 1 Lemonldap\ | 2025-02-14 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| An issue was discovered in LemonLDAP::NG before 2.16.1. Weak session ID generation in the AuthBasic handler and incorrect failure handling during a password check allow attackers to bypass 2FA verification. Any plugin that tries to deny session creation after the store step does not deny an AuthBasic session. | |||||
| CVE-2023-27536 | 5 Debian, Fedoraproject, Haxx and 2 more | 14 Debian Linux, Fedora, Libcurl and 11 more | 2025-02-14 | N/A | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| An authentication bypass vulnerability exists libcurl <8.0.0 in the connection reuse feature which can reuse previously established connections with incorrect user permissions due to a failure to check for changes in the CURLOPT_GSSAPI_DELEGATION option. This vulnerability affects krb5/kerberos/negotiate/GSSAPI transfers and could potentially result in unauthorized access to sensitive information. The safest option is to not reuse connections if the CURLOPT_GSSAPI_DELEGATION option has been changed. | |||||
| CVE-2013-0625 | 4 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft and 1 more | 4 Coldfusion, Mac Os X, Windows and 1 more | 2025-02-13 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Adobe ColdFusion 9.0, 9.0.1, and 9.0.2, when a password is not configured, allows remote attackers to bypass authentication and possibly execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors, as exploited in the wild in January 2013. | |||||
| CVE-2025-24904 | 2025-02-13 | N/A | N/A | ||
| libsignal-service-rs is a Rust version of the libsignal-service-java library which implements the core functionality to communicate with Signal servers. Prior to commit 82d70f6720e762898f34ae76b0894b0297d9b2f8, plaintext content envelopes could be injected by a server or a malicious client, and may have been able to bypass the end-to-end encryption and authentication. The vulnerability is fixed per 82d70f6720e762898f34ae76b0894b0297d9b2f8. The `Metadata` struct contains an additional `was_encrypted` field, which breaks the API, but should be easily resolvable. No known workarounds are available. | |||||
| CVE-2021-26074 | 1 Atlassian | 1 Connect Spring Boot | 2025-02-12 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Broken Authentication in Atlassian Connect Spring Boot (ACSB) from version 1.1.0 before version 2.1.3: Atlassian Connect Spring Boot is a Java Spring Boot package for building Atlassian Connect apps. Authentication between Atlassian products and the Atlassian Connect Spring Boot app occurs with a server-to-server JWT or a context JWT. Atlassian Connect Spring Boot versions from version 1.1.0 before version 2.1.3 erroneously accept context JWTs in lifecycle endpoints (such as installation) where only server-to-server JWTs should be accepted, permitting an attacker to send authenticated re-installation events to an app. | |||||
| CVE-2021-26077 | 1 Atlassian | 1 Connect Spring Boot | 2025-02-12 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Broken Authentication in Atlassian Connect Spring Boot (ACSB) in version 1.1.0 before 2.1.3 and from version 2.1.4 before 2.1.5: Atlassian Connect Spring Boot is a Java Spring Boot package for building Atlassian Connect apps. Authentication between Atlassian products and the Atlassian Connect Spring Boot app occurs with a server-to-server JWT or a context JWT. Atlassian Connect Spring Boot versions 1.1.0 before 2.1.3 and versions 2.1.4 before 2.1.5 erroneously accept context JWTs in lifecycle endpoints (such as installation) where only server-to-server JWTs should be accepted, permitting an attacker to send authenticated re-installation events to an app. | |||||
| CVE-2021-26073 | 1 Atlassian | 1 Connect Express | 2025-02-12 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 7.7 HIGH |
| Broken Authentication in Atlassian Connect Express (ACE) from version 3.0.2 before version 6.6.0: Atlassian Connect Express is a Node.js package for building Atlassian Connect apps. Authentication between Atlassian products and the Atlassian Connect Express app occurs with a server-to-server JWT or a context JWT. Atlassian Connect Express versions from 3.0.2 before 6.6.0 erroneously accept context JWTs in lifecycle endpoints (such as installation) where only server-to-server JWTs should be accepted, permitting an attacker to send authenticated re-installation events to an app. | |||||
| CVE-2025-25201 | 2025-02-12 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Nitrokey 3 Firmware is the the firmware of Nitrokey 3 USB keys. For release 1.8.0, and test releases with PIV enabled prior to 1.8.0, the PIV application could accept invalid keys for authentication of the admin key. This could lead to compromise of the integrity of the data stored in the application. An attacker without access to the proper administration key would be able to generate new keys and overwrite certificates. Such an attacker would not be able to read-out or extract existing private data, nor would they be able to gain access to cryptographic operations that would normally require PIN-based authentication. The issue is fixed in piv-authenticator 0.3.9, and in Nitrokey's firmware 1.8.1. | |||||
| CVE-2023-28727 | 1 Panasonic | 2 Aiseg2, Aiseg2 Firmware | 2025-02-12 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| Panasonic AiSEG2 versions 2.00J through 2.93A allows adjacent attackers bypass authentication due to mishandling of X-Forwarded-For headers. | |||||
| CVE-2023-25597 | 1 Mitel | 1 Micollab | 2025-02-07 | N/A | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability in the web conferencing component of Mitel MiCollab through 9.6.2.9 could allow an unauthenticated attacker to download a shared file via a crafted request - including the exact path and filename - due to improper authentication control. A successful exploit could allow access to sensitive information. | |||||
| CVE-2024-20856 | 1 Samsung | 1 Android | 2025-02-07 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| Improper Authentication vulnerability in Secure Folder prior to SMR May-2024 Release 1 allows physical attackers to access Secure Folder without proper authentication in a specific scenario. | |||||
| CVE-2023-30869 | 1 Awesomemotive | 1 Easy Digital Downloads | 2025-02-07 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Improper Authentication vulnerability in Easy Digital Downloads plugin allows unauth. Privilege Escalation. This issue affects Easy Digital Downloads: from 3.1 through 3.1.1.4.1. | |||||
| CVE-2022-45174 | 1 Liveboxcloud | 1 Vdesk | 2025-02-07 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| An issue was discovered in LIVEBOX Collaboration vDesk through v018. A Bypass of Two-Factor Authentication for SAML Users can occur under the /login/backup_code endpoint and the /api/v1/vdeskintegration/challenge endpoint. The correctness of the TOTP is not checked properly, and can be bypassed by passing any string as the backup code. | |||||
| CVE-2022-45173 | 1 Liveboxcloud | 1 Vdesk | 2025-02-07 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| An issue was discovered in LIVEBOX Collaboration vDesk through v018. A Bypass of Two-Factor Authentication can occur under the /api/v1/vdeskintegration/challenge endpoint. Because only the client-side verifies whether a check was successful, an attacker can modify the response, and fool the application into concluding that the TOTP was correct. | |||||
| CVE-2021-40507 | 1 Openrisc | 2 Or1200, Or1200 Firmware | 2025-02-06 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| An issue was discovered in the ALU unit of the OR1200 (aka OpenRISC 1200) processor 2011-09-10 through 2015-11-11. The overflow flag is not being updated correctly for the subtract instruction, which results in an incorrect value in the overflow flag. Any software that relies on this flag may experience corruption in execution. | |||||
| CVE-2021-40506 | 1 Openrisc | 2 Or1200, Or1200 Firmware | 2025-02-06 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| An issue was discovered in the ALU unit of the OR1200 (aka OpenRISC 1200) processor 2011-09-10 through 2015-11-11. The overflow flag is not being updated for the msb and mac instructions, which results in an incorrect value in the overflow flag. Any software that relies on this flag may experience corruption in execution. | |||||