Total
7102 CVE
CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2020-26220 | 1 Touchbase.ai Project | 1 Touchbase.ai | 2020-11-17 | 3.5 LOW | 3.5 LOW |
toucbase.ai before version 2.0 leaks information by not stripping exif data from images. Anyone with access to the uploaded image of other users could obtain its geolocation, device, and software version data etc (if present. The issue is fixed in version 2.0. | |||||
CVE-2016-9845 | 1 Qemu | 1 Qemu | 2020-11-10 | 2.1 LOW | 6.5 MEDIUM |
QEMU (aka Quick Emulator) built with the Virtio GPU Device emulator support is vulnerable to an information leakage issue. It could occur while processing 'VIRTIO_GPU_CMD_GET_CAPSET_INFO' command. A guest user/process could use this flaw to leak contents of the host memory bytes. | |||||
CVE-2020-4649 | 1 Ibm | 1 Planning Analytics Local | 2020-11-10 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
IBM Planning Analytics Local 2.0.9.2 and IBM Planning Analytics Workspace 57 could expose data to non-privleged users by not invalidating TM1Web user sessions. IBM X-Force ID: 186022. | |||||
CVE-2019-4349 | 1 Ibm | 1 Maximo Anywhere | 2020-11-10 | 3.6 LOW | 3.5 LOW |
IBM Maximo Anywhere 7.6.2.0, 7.6.2.1, 7.6.3.0, and 7.6.3.1 applications can be installed on a deprecated operating system version that could compromised the confidentiality and integrity of the service. IBM X-Force ID: 161486 | |||||
CVE-2008-3914 | 1 Clamav | 1 Clamav | 2020-11-05 | 10.0 HIGH | N/A |
Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in ClamAV before 0.94 have unknown impact and attack vectors related to file descriptor leaks on the "error path" in (1) libclamav/others.c and (2) libclamav/sis.c. | |||||
CVE-2020-27612 | 1 Bigbluebutton | 1 Bigbluebutton | 2020-10-29 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
Greenlight in BigBlueButton through 2.2.28 places usernames in room URLs, which may represent an unintended information leak to users in a room, or an information leak to outsiders if any user publishes a screenshot of a browser window. | |||||
CVE-2016-3024 | 1 Ibm | 5 Security Access Manager 9.0 Firmware, Security Access Manager For Mobile 8.0 Firmware, Security Access Manager For Mobile Appliance and 2 more | 2020-10-27 | 2.1 LOW | 4.0 MEDIUM |
IBM Security Access Manager for Web allows web pages to be stored locally which can be read by another user on the system. | |||||
CVE-2016-3043 | 1 Ibm | 6 Security Access Manager 9.0 Firmware, Security Access Manager For Mobile, Security Access Manager For Mobile Appliance and 3 more | 2020-10-27 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
IBM Security Access Manager for Web could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information, caused by the failure to properly enable HTTP Strict Transport Security. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to obtain sensitive information using man in the middle techniques. | |||||
CVE-2016-3023 | 1 Ibm | 6 Security Access Manager 9.0 Firmware, Security Access Manager For Mobile 8.0 Firmware, Security Access Manager For Mobile Appliance and 3 more | 2020-10-27 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
IBM Security Access Manager for Web could allow an unauthenticated user to gain access to sensitive information by entering invalid file names. | |||||
CVE-2016-3021 | 1 Ibm | 6 Security Access Manager 9.0 Firmware, Security Access Manager For Mobile 8.0 Firmware, Security Access Manager For Mobile Appliance and 3 more | 2020-10-27 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 2.7 LOW |
IBM Security Access Manager for Web could allow an authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information from error message using a specially crafted HTTP request. | |||||
CVE-2020-15235 | 1 Ractf | 1 Core | 2020-10-19 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
In RACTF before commit f3dc89b, unauthenticated users are able to get the value of sensitive config keys that would normally be hidden to everyone except admins. All versions after commit f3dc89b9f6ab1544a289b3efc06699b13d63e0bd(3/10/20) are patched. | |||||
CVE-2019-3781 | 1 Cloudfoundry | 1 Command Line Interface | 2020-10-19 | 3.5 LOW | 8.8 HIGH |
Cloud Foundry CLI, versions prior to v6.43.0, improperly exposes passwords when verbose/trace/debugging is turned on. A local unauthenticated or remote authenticated malicious user with access to logs may gain part or all of a users password. | |||||
CVE-2020-14183 | 1 Atlassian | 1 Jira | 2020-10-19 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
Affected versions of Jira Server & Data Center allow a remote attacker with limited (non-admin) privileges to view a Jira instance's Support Entitlement Number (SEN) via an Information Disclosure vulnerability in the HTTP Response headers. The affected versions are before version 7.13.18, from version 8.0.0 before 8.5.9, and from version 8.6.0 before 8.12.1. | |||||
CVE-2017-8443 | 1 Elastic | 1 Kibana | 2020-10-19 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
In Kibana X-Pack security versions prior to 5.4.3 if a Kibana user opens a crafted Kibana URL the result could be a redirect to an improperly initialized Kibana login screen. If the user enters credentials on this screen, the credentials will appear in the URL bar. The credentials could then be viewed by untrusted parties or logged into the Kibana access logs. | |||||
CVE-2015-5160 | 2 Libvirt, Redhat | 10 Libvirt, Enterprise Linux, Enterprise Linux Desktop and 7 more | 2020-10-15 | 2.1 LOW | 5.5 MEDIUM |
libvirt before 2.2 includes Ceph credentials on the qemu command line when using RADOS Block Device (aka RBD), which allows local users to obtain sensitive information via a process listing. | |||||
CVE-2018-19039 | 3 Grafana, Netapp, Redhat | 7 Grafana, Active Iq Performance Analytics Services, Storagegrid Webscale Nas Bridge and 4 more | 2020-10-04 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
Grafana before 4.6.5 and 5.x before 5.3.3 allows remote authenticated users to read arbitrary files by leveraging Editor or Admin permissions. | |||||
CVE-2019-0040 | 1 Juniper | 1 Junos | 2020-09-29 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 9.1 CRITICAL |
On Junos OS, rpcbind should only be listening to port 111 on the internal routing instance (IRI). External packets destined to port 111 should be dropped. Due to an information leak vulnerability, responses were being generated from the source address of the management interface (e.g. fxp0) thus disclosing internal addressing and existence of the management interface itself. A high rate of crafted packets destined to port 111 may also lead to a partial Denial of Service (DoS). Note: Systems with fxp0 disabled or unconfigured are not vulnerable to this issue. This issue only affects Junos OS releases based on FreeBSD 10 or higher (typically Junos OS 15.1+). Administrators can confirm whether systems are running a version of Junos OS based on FreeBSD 10 or higher by typing: user@junos> show version | match kernel JUNOS OS Kernel 64-bit [20181214.223829_fbsd-builder_stable_10] Affected releases are Juniper Networks Junos OS: 15.1 versions prior to 15.1F6-S12, 15.1R7-S4; 15.1X53 versions prior to 15.1X53-D236; 16.1 versions prior to 16.1R7-S1; 16.2 versions prior to 16.2R2-S9; 17.1 versions prior to 17.1R3; 17.2 versions prior to 17.2R1-S8; 17.3 versions prior to 17.3R2; 17.4 versions prior to 17.4R1-S1, 17.4R1-S7, 17.4R2. This issue does not affect Junos OS releases prior to 15.1. | |||||
CVE-2019-1094 | 1 Microsoft | 8 Windows 10, Windows 7, Windows 8.1 and 5 more | 2020-09-28 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
An information disclosure vulnerability exists when the Windows GDI component improperly discloses the contents of its memory, aka 'Windows GDI Information Disclosure Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-1095, CVE-2019-1098, CVE-2019-1099, CVE-2019-1100, CVE-2019-1101, CVE-2019-1116. | |||||
CVE-2019-1101 | 1 Microsoft | 2 Windows 7, Windows Server 2008 | 2020-09-28 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
An information disclosure vulnerability exists when the Windows GDI component improperly discloses the contents of its memory, aka 'Windows GDI Information Disclosure Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-1094, CVE-2019-1095, CVE-2019-1098, CVE-2019-1099, CVE-2019-1100, CVE-2019-1116. | |||||
CVE-2017-0242 | 1 Microsoft | 2 Windows 7, Windows Server 2008 | 2020-09-28 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.5 MEDIUM |
An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the way some ActiveX objects are instantiated, aka "Microsoft ActiveX Information Disclosure Vulnerability." |