Total
11965 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2018-9515 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2019-10-03 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| In sdcardfs_create and sdcardfs_mkdir of inode.c, there is a possible memory corruption due to improper locking. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Product: Android Versions: Android kernel Android ID: A-111641492 References: N/A | |||||
| CVE-2017-11244 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 7 Acrobat, Acrobat Dc, Acrobat Reader and 4 more | 2019-10-03 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Adobe Acrobat Reader 2017.009.20058 and earlier, 2017.008.30051 and earlier, 2015.006.30306 and earlier, and 11.0.20 and earlier has an exploitable memory corruption vulnerability in the image conversion engine when processing Enhanced Metafile Format (EMF) data related to transformation of blocks of pixels. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution. | |||||
| CVE-2017-18283 | 1 Qualcomm | 18 Qca9379, Qca9379 Firmware, Sd210 and 15 more | 2019-10-03 | 6.1 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Possible memory corruption when Read Val Blob Req is received with invalid parameters in Snapdragon Mobile in version QCA9379, SD 210/SD 212/SD 205, SD 625, SD 835, SD 845, SD 850, SDA660. | |||||
| CVE-2017-11233 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 7 Acrobat, Acrobat Dc, Acrobat Reader and 4 more | 2019-10-03 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Adobe Acrobat Reader 2017.009.20058 and earlier, 2017.008.30051 and earlier, 2015.006.30306 and earlier, and 11.0.20 and earlier has an exploitable memory corruption vulnerability in the image conversion engine when processing Enhanced Metafile Format (EMF) data related to block transfer of pixels. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution. | |||||
| CVE-2018-6851 | 1 Sophos | 3 Safeguard Easy Device Encryption Client, Safeguard Enterprise Client, Safeguard Lan Crypt Client | 2019-10-03 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| Sophos SafeGuard Enterprise before 8.00.5, SafeGuard Easy before 7.00.3, and SafeGuard LAN Crypt before 3.95.2 are vulnerable to Local Privilege Escalation via IOCTL 0x80206040. By crafting an input buffer we can control the execution path to the point where the constant DWORD 0 will be written to a user-controlled address. We can take advantage of this condition to zero-out the pointer to the security descriptor in the object header of a privileged process or modify the security descriptor itself and run code in the context of a process running as SYSTEM. | |||||
| CVE-2017-13208 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2019-10-03 | 10.0 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| In receive_packet of libnetutils/packet.c, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to a missing bounds check on the DHCP response. This could lead to remote code execution as a privileged process with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Product: Android. Versions: 5.1.1, 6.0, 6.0.1, 7.0, 7.1.1, 7.1.2, 8.0, 8.1. Android ID: A-67474440. | |||||
| CVE-2018-11095 | 1 Libming | 1 Libming | 2019-10-03 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| The decompileJUMP function in decompile.c in libming through 0.4.8 mishandles cases where the header indicates a file size greater than the actual size, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (Segmentation fault and application crash) or possibly have unspecified other impact. | |||||
| CVE-2018-4273 | 2 Apple, Microsoft | 7 Icloud, Iphone Os, Itunes and 4 more | 2019-10-03 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Multiple memory corruption issues were addressed with improved input validation. This issue affected versions prior to iOS 11.4.1, tvOS 11.4.1, watchOS 4.3.2, Safari 11.1.2, iTunes 12.8 for Windows, iCloud for Windows 7.6. | |||||
| CVE-2017-8378 | 1 Podofo Project | 1 Podofo | 2019-10-03 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in the PdfParser::ReadObjects function in base/PdfParser.cpp in PoDoFo 0.9.5 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly have unspecified other impact via vectors related to m_offsets.size. | |||||
| CVE-2017-11209 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 7 Acrobat, Acrobat Dc, Acrobat Reader and 4 more | 2019-10-03 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Adobe Acrobat Reader 2017.009.20058 and earlier, 2017.008.30051 and earlier, 2015.006.30306 and earlier, and 11.0.20 and earlier has an exploitable memory corruption vulnerability that occurs when reading a JPEG file embedded within XML Paper Specification (XPS) file. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution. | |||||
| CVE-2017-8660 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Edge, Windows 10, Windows Server 2016 | 2019-10-03 | 9.3 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| Microsoft Edge in Microsoft Windows 10 1511, 1607, 1703, and Windows Server 2016 allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user, due to the way that Microsoft browser JavaScript engines render content when handling objects in memory, aka "Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability". This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2017-8649, CVE-2017-8729, CVE-2017-8738, CVE-2017-8740, CVE-2017-8741, CVE-2017-8748, CVE-2017-8752, CVE-2017-8753, CVE-2017-8755, CVE-2017-8756, and CVE-2017-11764. | |||||
| CVE-2017-0072 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Windows 7, Windows Server 2008, Windows Vista | 2019-10-03 | 9.3 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| Uniscribe in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2, Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, and Windows 7 SP1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted web site, aka "Uniscribe Remote Code Execution Vulnerability." This vulnerability is different from those described in CVE-2017-0083, CVE-2017-0084, CVE-2017-0086, CVE-2017-0087, CVE-2017-0088, CVE-2017-0089, and CVE-2017-0090. | |||||
| CVE-2018-6853 | 1 Sophos | 3 Safeguard Easy Device Encryption Client, Safeguard Enterprise Client, Safeguard Lan Crypt Client | 2019-10-03 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| Sophos SafeGuard Enterprise before 8.00.5, SafeGuard Easy before 7.00.3, and SafeGuard LAN Crypt before 3.95.2 are vulnerable to Local Privilege Escalation via IOCTL 0x80206024. By crafting an input buffer we can control the execution path to the point where a global variable will be written to a user controlled address. We can take advantage of this condition to zero-out the pointer to the security descriptor in the object header of a privileged process or modify the security descriptor itself and run code in the context of a process running as SYSTEM. | |||||
| CVE-2018-6857 | 1 Sophos | 3 Safeguard Easy Device Encryption Client, Safeguard Enterprise Client, Safeguard Lan Crypt Client | 2019-10-03 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| Sophos SafeGuard Enterprise before 8.00.5, SafeGuard Easy before 7.00.3, and SafeGuard LAN Crypt before 3.95.2 are vulnerable to Local Privilege Escalation via IOCTL 0x802022E0. By crafting an input buffer we can control the execution path to the point where the constant 0x12 will be written to a user-controlled address. We can take advantage of this condition to modify the SEP_TOKEN_PRIVILEGES structure of the Token object belonging to the exploit process and grant SE_DEBUG_NAME privilege. This allows the exploit process to interact with higher privileged processes running as SYSTEM and execute code in their security context. | |||||
| CVE-2018-10359 | 1 Trendmicro | 1 Officescan | 2019-10-03 | 5.4 MEDIUM | 6.3 MEDIUM |
| A pool corruption privilege escalation vulnerability in Trend Micro OfficeScan 11.0 SP1 and XG could allow a local attacker to escalate privileges on vulnerable installations due to a flaw within the processing of IOCTL 0x220078 in the TMWFP driver. An attacker must first obtain the ability to execute low-privileged code on the target system in order to exploit this vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2017-11242 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 7 Acrobat, Acrobat Dc, Acrobat Reader and 4 more | 2019-10-03 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Adobe Acrobat Reader 2017.009.20058 and earlier, 2017.008.30051 and earlier, 2015.006.30306 and earlier, and 11.0.20 and earlier has an exploitable memory corruption vulnerability in the image conversion engine when processing Enhanced Metafile Format (EMF) data related to line segments. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution. | |||||
| CVE-2017-0781 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2019-10-03 | 8.3 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| A remote code execution vulnerability in the Android system (bluetooth). Product: Android. Versions: 4.4.4, 5.0.2, 5.1.1, 6.0, 6.0.1, 7.0, 7.1.1, 7.1.2, 8.0. Android ID: A-63146105. | |||||
| CVE-2017-8726 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Edge, Windows 10, Windows Server 2016 | 2019-10-03 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| Microsoft Edge in Microsoft Windows 10 Gold, 1511, 1607, 1703, and Windows Server 2016 allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user, due to how affected Microsoft scripting engines handle objects in memory, aka "Microsoft Edge Memory Corruption Vulnerability". This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2017-11794 and CVE-2017-11803. | |||||
| CVE-2018-6855 | 1 Sophos | 3 Safeguard Easy Device Encryption Client, Safeguard Enterprise Client, Safeguard Lan Crypt Client | 2019-10-03 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| Sophos SafeGuard Enterprise before 8.00.5, SafeGuard Easy before 7.00.3, and SafeGuard LAN Crypt before 3.95.2 are vulnerable to Local Privilege Escalation via IOCTL 0x80202014. By crafting an input buffer we can control the execution path to the point where the constant 0xFFFFFFF will be written to a user-controlled address. We can take advantage of this condition to modify the SEP_TOKEN_PRIVILEGES structure of the Token object belonging to the exploit process and grant SE_DEBUG_NAME privilege. This allows the exploit process to interact with higher privileged processes running as SYSTEM and execute code in their security context. | |||||
| CVE-2018-17161 | 1 Freebsd | 1 Freebsd | 2019-10-03 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| In FreeBSD before 11.2-STABLE(r348229), 11.2-RELEASE-p7, 12.0-STABLE(r342228), and 12.0-RELEASE-p1, insufficient validation of network-provided data in bootpd may make it possible for a malicious attacker to craft a bootp packet which could cause a stack buffer overflow. It is possible that the buffer overflow could lead to a Denial of Service or remote code execution. | |||||